Etoposide side effects: what 73,088 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
73,088 reports · 97% serious · 17,814 with death outcome · 41% female
Used for
Etoposide Injection is indicated in the management of the following neoplasms: Refractory Testicular Tumors Etoposide Injection in combination therapy with other approved chemotherapeutic agents in patients with refractory testicular tumors who have already received appropriate surgical, chemotherapeutic, and radiotherapeutic therapy.
What it is
DESCRIPTION Etoposide Injection, USP (also commonly known as VP-16) is a semisynthetic derivative of podophyllotoxin used in the treatment of certain neoplastic diseases. It is 4'-demethylepipodophyllotoxin 9-[4,6-0-(R)-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside].
Boxed warning
Etoposide injection should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Severe myelosuppression with resulting infection or bleeding may occur.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,204 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia | 144 | 13,540.8 4,316.3–42,479.5ROR 13,567.6 · calibrated p 5e-21 ✓ | 267.5 EB05 232.8 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=144 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Thymus hypoplasia | 148 | 1,897.8 1,212.7–2,969.7ROR 1,901.6 · calibrated p 4e-19 ✓ | 238.9 EB05 208.3 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=148 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Human bocavirus infection | 133 | 682.2 498.3–933.9ROR 683.4 · calibrated p 8e-15 ✓ | 194.7 EB05 168.5 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=133 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ovarian germ cell teratoma | 37 | 242.7 156.4–376.7ROR 242.9 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓ | 122.8 EB05 93.0 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Basal ganglion degeneration | 34 | 157.2 103.4–239.2ROR 157.3 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 96.0 EB05 71.8 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Medulloblastoma recurrent | 40 | 154.6 105.1–227.3ROR 154.7 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 95.7 EB05 73.3 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=40 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Renal salt-wasting syndrome | 136 | 151.0 122.7–186.0ROR 151.3 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓ | 97.4 EB05 84.4 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=136 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nephroblastoma | 42 | 139.4 96.3–201.7ROR 139.5 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 89.9 EB05 69.3 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=42 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cystitis bacterial | 110 | 137.3 109.3–172.4ROR 137.5 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 91.3 EB05 77.8 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=110 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malignant transformation | 138 | 127.6 104.4–156.0ROR 127.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 87.2 EB05 75.6 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=138 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma refractory | 283 | 125.7 109.3–144.6ROR 126.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 86.8 EB05 78.6 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=283 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Norovirus test positive | 97 | 122.7 96.7–155.7ROR 122.9 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 84.4 EB05 71.2 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=97 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuroblastoma recurrent | 59 | 118.9 87.7–161.1ROR 119.0 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓ | 81.8 EB05 65.7 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=59 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Teratoma | 57 | 103.1 76.1–139.6ROR 103.2 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 74.0 EB05 59.2 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=57 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Treatment related secondary malignancy | 53 | 99.7 72.9–136.3ROR 99.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 72.1 EB05 57.2 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=53 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Mycobacterium chelonae infection | 181 | 93.5 79.1–110.6ROR 93.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 70.0 EB05 61.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=181 | no trial arm names this drug |
| High-grade b-cell lymphoma | 45 | 90.0 64.4–125.9ROR 90.1 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 66.6 EB05 51.8 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=45 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Medulloblastoma | 35 | 87.4 59.8–127.7ROR 87.4 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓ | 64.7 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=34 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Refractory cancer | 50 | 86.0 62.7–118.0ROR 86.1 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 64.6 EB05 50.9 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Disseminated aspergillosis | 107 | 84.8 68.3–105.2ROR 84.9 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 64.7 EB05 55.1 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=107 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Meningitis tuberculous | 125 | 81.8 67.1–99.8ROR 82.0 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 63.1 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=125 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ovarian failure | 118 | 80.2 65.4–98.4ROR 80.3 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓ | 62.1 EB05 53.2 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=117 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma recurrent | 464 | 79.0 71.3–87.6ROR 79.5 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 61.8 EB05 57.2 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=461 · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Secondary immunodeficiency | 255 | 77.9 67.8–89.4ROR 78.1 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓ | 61.0 EB05 54.9 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious n=255 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Primary hypogonadism | 33 | 76.3 51.9–112.1ROR 76.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 58.3 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood stem cell transplant failure | 45 | 75.6 54.4–105.0ROR 75.6 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 58.4 EB05 45.4 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Abscess bacterial | 70 | 69.8 53.7–90.6ROR 69.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 55.3 EB05 45.3 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=70 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Osteosarcoma | 73 | 67.1 52.0–86.6ROR 67.1 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 53.7 EB05 44.1 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=73 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sweat gland tumour | 44 | 66.0 47.6–91.7ROR 66.1 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 52.5 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=42 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| T-cell type acute leukaemia | 37 | 62.9 44.0–89.8ROR 62.9 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 50.3 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=37 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| B-cell lymphoma recurrent | 95 | 60.9 48.8–76.0ROR 61.0 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓ | 49.8 EB05 41.9 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=95 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuroblastoma | 66 | 60.6 46.5–79.1ROR 60.7 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 49.4 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=65 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Central nervous system fungal infection | 37 | 59.6 41.8–85.0ROR 59.7 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓ | 48.3 EB05 36.6 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 41%) · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hepatosplenic t-cell lymphoma | 64 | 59.4 45.4–77.8ROR 59.4 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 48.6 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=64 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Caecitis | 78 | 59.2 46.3–75.5ROR 59.2 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 48.5 EB05 40.1 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=75 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Corona virus infection | 71 | 55.8 43.3–72.0ROR 55.8 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓ | 46.2 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=71 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Engraftment syndrome | 88 | 50.5 40.2–63.3ROR 50.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 42.6 EB05 35.6 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=88 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutropenic infection | 136 | 46.9 39.1–56.2ROR 47.0 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 40.1 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=136 · 98% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pseudomonal sepsis | 240 | 45.2 39.4–51.8ROR 45.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 39.0 EB05 35.0 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=240 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Central hypothyroidism | 42 | 45.1 32.5–62.4ROR 45.1 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 38.4 EB05 29.6 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 41%) · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 8,247 | 2.7 2.7–2.8ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.638 | 2.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 37.3 (34.0–40.9) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.9 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Febrile neutropenia | 7,715 | 37.8 36.9–38.6ROR 42.1 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 33.4 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 21.7 (20.2–23.4) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 19.8 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells)) | 5,063 | 11.1 10.8–11.4ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓ | 10.7 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 14.9 (13.8–16.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.5 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 4,719 | 1.0 1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.326 | 1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.7 · 96% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Disease progression | 4,508 | 11.4 11.0–11.7ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓ | 11.0 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 13.7 (12.7–14.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 7.3 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Thrombocytopenia (low platelets) | 4,107 | 10.9 10.6–11.3ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 10.6 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 13.9 (12.8–15.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 6.4 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 3,430 | 2.9 2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.642 | 2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 21.8 (19.5–24.4) | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 2.1 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anaemia (low red blood cells) | 3,359 | 5.1 5.0–5.3ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.202 | 5.0 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 9.5 (8.8–10.3) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sepsis (blood infection) | 3,036 | 8.0 7.7–8.3ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.059 | 7.8 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 51.6 (43.2–61.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product use in unapproved indication | 2,981 | 3.5 3.4–3.7ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.452 | 3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 19.5 (17.4–21.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 4.5 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Death | 2,840 | 0.9 0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.270 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 6.4 (5.9–6.8) | Outcome field, not a reaction boxed warning mentions mortality | serious PRR 0.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pancytopenia (all blood cells low) | 2,761 | 14.9 14.4–15.5ROR 15.5 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓ | 14.2 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 14.9 (13.4–16.5) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 8.5 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 2,511 | 2.2 2.2–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.911 | 2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 1.4 · 94% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 2,484 | 0.9 0.9–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.243 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: PRR 12.1 (11.0–13.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.0 · 93% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 2,288 | 1.0 1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.320 | 1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Topoisomerase Inhibitors: only this drug | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.0 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia — n=144, PRR 13,540.8
- Thymus hypoplasia — n=148, PRR 1,897.8
- Human bocavirus infection — n=133, PRR 682.2
- Ovarian germ cell teratoma — n=37, PRR 242.7
- Basal ganglion degeneration — n=34, PRR 157.2
- Medulloblastoma recurrent — n=40, PRR 154.6
- Renal salt-wasting syndrome — n=136, PRR 151.0
- Nephroblastoma — n=42, PRR 139.4
- Cystitis bacterial — n=110, PRR 137.3
- Malignant transformation — n=138, PRR 127.6
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Etoposide ↔ Febrile neutropenia.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Etoposide?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Etoposide are febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, anaemia, sepsis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Etoposide have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Etoposide injection should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Severe myelosuppression with resulting infection or bleeding may occur.
Do FAERS signals prove that Etoposide causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 0dddbe44-b4f4-431f-9011-8a54abbd4cbf, effective 20260520; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"ETOPOSIDE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,244 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
ETOPOSIDE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.