← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Glatiramer side effects: what 4,883 FDA adverse event reports show

Glatiramer · Glatiramer Acetate · 200 reaction terms · 7,744 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Glatiramer Acetate

openFDA label

Who reports

4,883 reports · 73% serious · 177 with death outcome · 78% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Glatiramer acetate injection is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults. Glatiramer acetate inj.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Glatiramer acetate, the active ingredient of glatiramer acetate injection, consists of the acetate salts of synthetic polypeptides, containing four naturally occurring amino acids: L-glutamic acid, L-alanine, L-tyrosine, and L-lysine with an average molar fraction of 0.141, 0.427, 0.095, and 0.338, respectively.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS Cases of life-threatening and fatal anaphylaxis have been reported with glatiramer acetate injection. Anaphylaxis can occur at any time following initiation of therapy, from as early as after the first dose, up to years following initiation of therapy.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 3Labeled adverse reaction 7Labeled (related wording) 12Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 10
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 160 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Multiple sclerosis51446.4
42.7–50.4ROR 51.8 · χ² 22,597 / p <1e-300
45.8 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 52.2no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse46529.1
26.7–31.7ROR 32.0 · χ² 12,534 / p <1e-300
28.9 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 30.9no trial data cached
Injection site mass18621.8
18.9–25.1ROR 22.6 · χ² 3,653 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 70.2 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Injection site reaction17210.8
9.3–12.5ROR 11.1 · χ² 1,519 / p <1e-300
10.7 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 25.2no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus16210.5
9.0–12.2ROR 10.8 · χ² 1,380 / p <1e-300
10.3 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 41.8no trial data cached
Device mechanical issue299.7
6.7–13.9ROR 9.7 · χ² 216 / p 3e-49
8.9 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=14 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Lymphopenia309.2
6.4–13.1ROR 9.2 · χ² 210 / p 7e-48
8.5 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Product substitution issue1128.4
7.0–10.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 720 / p 6e-159
8.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)2378.3
7.3–9.4ROR 8.6 · χ² 1,511 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.1no trial data cached
Central nervous system lesion268.1
5.5–11.9ROR 8.1 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
7.3 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Device use issue328.0
5.6–11.2ROR 8.0 · χ² 187 / p 6e-43
7.3 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=19 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy1467.1
6.1–8.4ROR 7.3 · χ² 764 / p 2e-168
7.0 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 78%)no trial data cached
Hemiparesis266.6
4.5–9.6ROR 6.6 · χ² 117 / p 2e-27
5.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted1036.4
5.3–7.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 467 / p 9e-104
6.2 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Injection site pain (pain where injected)4175.9
5.4–6.5ROR 6.4 · χ² 1,717 / p <1e-300
5.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 21.7no trial data cached
Needle issue395.9
4.3–8.0ROR 5.9 · χ² 152 / p 3e-35
5.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Ataxia165.8
3.5–9.4ROR 5.8 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
5.0 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Muscle spasticity165.5
3.4–9.0ROR 5.6 · χ² 55 / p 6e-14
4.8 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Flushing1315.5
4.7–6.5ROR 5.6 · χ² 481 / p 5e-107
5.4 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Therapy cessation625.2
4.1–6.7ROR 5.3 · χ² 207 / p 3e-47
5.0 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Pharyngeal swelling114.9
2.7–8.9ROR 4.9 · χ² 31 / p 2e-8
4.2 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Abortion induced104.6
2.5–8.5ROR 4.6 · χ² 24 / p 4e-7
3.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Diplopia (double vision)264.3
2.9–6.3ROR 4.3 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
4.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia (numbness)1484.2
3.6–5.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 366 / p 7e-82
4.2 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Paralysis133.9
2.3–6.7ROR 3.9 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
3.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Anaphylactic shock233.9
2.6–5.8ROR 3.9 · χ² 46 / p 6e-12
3.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous363.8
2.8–5.3ROR 3.9 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
3.7 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 78%)no trial data cached
Micturition urgency103.8
2.0–7.0ROR 3.8 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.9no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Multiple sclerosis51446.4
42.7–50.4ROR 51.8 · χ² 22,597 / p <1e-300
45.8 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 52.2no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse46529.1
26.7–31.7ROR 32.0 · χ² 12,534 / p <1e-300
28.9 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 30.9no trial data cached
Injection site pain (pain where injected)4175.9
5.4–6.5ROR 6.4 · χ² 1,717 / p <1e-300
5.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 21.7no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)2378.3
7.3–9.4ROR 8.6 · χ² 1,511 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.1no trial data cached
Fall1982.6
2.2–2.9ROR 2.6 · χ² 189 / p 2e-43
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Injection site mass18621.8
18.9–25.1ROR 22.6 · χ² 3,653 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 70.2 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Injection site reaction17210.8
9.3–12.5ROR 11.1 · χ² 1,519 / p <1e-300
10.7 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 25.2no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus16210.5
9.0–12.2ROR 10.8 · χ² 1,380 / p <1e-300
10.3 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 41.8no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue1552.3
2.0–2.7ROR 2.4 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
2.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia (numbness)1484.2
3.6–5.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 366 / p 7e-82
4.2 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy1467.1
6.1–8.4ROR 7.3 · χ² 764 / p 2e-168
7.0 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 78%)no trial data cached
Flushing1315.5
4.7–6.5ROR 5.6 · χ² 481 / p 5e-107
5.4 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Gait disturbance1292.9
2.4–3.4ROR 2.9 · χ² 159 / p 1e-36
2.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Product substitution issue1128.4
7.0–10.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 720 / p 6e-159
8.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Glatiramer?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Glatiramer are multiple sclerosis, multiple sclerosis relapse, injection site pain, injection site erythema, fall, injection site mass. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Glatiramer have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS Cases of life-threatening and fatal anaphylaxis have been reported with glatiramer acetate injection. Anaphylaxis can occur at any time following initiation of therapy, from as early as after the first dose, up to years following initiation of therapy.

Do FAERS signals prove that Glatiramer causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.