Insulin Human side effects: what 39,515 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Insulin
Brand names
Afrezza
Who reports
39,515 reports · 60% serious · 2,907 with death outcome · 56% female
Used for
AFREZZA ® is indicated to improve glycemic control in adult and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older with diabetes mellitus. AFREZZA ® is a rapid acting inhaled human insulin indicated to improve glycemic control in adult and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older with diabetes mellitus.
What it is
11.1 AFREZZA Cartridges Human insulin is a rapid acting human insulin produced by recombinant DNA technology utilizing a non-pathogenic laboratory strain of Escherichia coli (K12).
Boxed warning
RISK OF ACUTE BRONCHOSPASM IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE Acute bronchospasm has been observed in AFREZZA-treated patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )]. AFREZZA is contraindicated in patients with chronic lung disease such as asthma or COPD [see Contraindications ( 4 )].
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,169 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycaemia unawareness | 69 | 126.1 97.0–164.0ROR 126.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 99.1 EB05 80.9 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=65 · 71% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Insulin resistant diabetes | 22 | 119.8 75.4–190.3ROR 119.8 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 90.2 EB05 62.8 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Shock hypoglycaemic | 71 | 93.0 72.3–119.7ROR 93.2 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 77.5 EB05 63.5 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=68 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Increased insulin requirement | 32 | 82.4 56.8–119.6ROR 82.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 68.5 EB05 50.8 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Insulin resistance | 257 | 76.1 66.8–86.7ROR 76.5 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓ | 66.2 EB05 59.7 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=158 · 83% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Coronary artery surgery | 34 | 64.9 45.4–92.6ROR 64.9 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓ | 56.1 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=34 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic retinopathy | 331 | 57.2 51.1–64.1ROR 57.7 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 51.5 EB05 47.0 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=294 · 79% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anti-insulin antibody positive | 20 | 55.6 35.1–88.2ROR 55.6 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 48.2 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=20 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic vascular disorder | 20 | 46.7 29.5–73.7ROR 46.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 41.4 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemic unconsciousness | 159 | 46.1 39.2–54.2ROR 46.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 42.2 EB05 37.0 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=159 · 86% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood glucose fluctuation | 792 | 41.2 38.3–44.2ROR 42.0 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 38.2 EB05 36.0 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=525 · 86% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood glucose decreased | 3,299 | 38.9 37.6–40.3ROR 42.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 36.3 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 40.5 · 90% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic eye disease | 31 | 38.9 27.0–56.0ROR 38.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 35.5 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=23 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Multi-organ disorder | 130 | 37.1 31.1–44.3ROR 37.2 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓ | 34.6 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=130 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemic seizure | 53 | 32.6 24.7–43.1ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.5 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=52 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuropathic arthropathy | 37 | 32.3 23.2–45.1ROR 32.4 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 30.1 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic gastroparesis | 20 | 30.6 19.5–48.0ROR 30.6 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 28.2 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=20 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent | 27 | 29.7 20.2–43.8ROR 29.7 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 27.7 EB05 20.0 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood glucose increased | 10,008 | 29.6 29.1–30.1ROR 39.3 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 28.1 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 30.6 · 90% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic neuropathy | 251 | 28.1 24.8–31.9ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 26.7 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=218 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neuropathy | 86 | 27.8 22.4–34.5ROR 27.9 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 26.3 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=84 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood glucose abnormal | 915 | 27.5 25.8–29.4ROR 28.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 26.2 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 28.4 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intercepted drug dispensing error | 74 | 27.4 21.7–34.5ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 25.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intercepted product selection error | 61 | 27.0 20.9–35.0ROR 27.1 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 25.6 EB05 20.6 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Stress symptoms | 21 | 25.6 16.5–39.6ROR 25.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 24.0 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic complication | 118 | 25.6 21.3–30.7ROR 25.6 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 24.3 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=110 · 88% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | 789 | 24.7 23.0–26.5ROR 25.2 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 23.6 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 23.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic coma | 121 | 23.7 19.7–28.4ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓ | 22.6 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=121 · 88% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Retinopathy | 157 | 23.2 19.8–27.3ROR 23.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.2 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=142 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Large for dates baby | 37 | 23.1 16.6–32.1ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.9 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Incorrect drug dosage form administered | 25 | 22.3 15.0–33.3ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 21.1 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Glycosylated haemoglobin increased | 967 | 21.2 19.8–22.5ROR 21.7 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.4 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 20.1 · 85% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemic coma | 107 | 20.3 16.8–24.7ROR 20.4 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.6 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=106 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wrong drug administered | 329 | 20.0 17.9–22.3ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.3 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=142 · 83% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Eye haemorrhage | 471 | 19.3 17.7–21.2ROR 19.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 18.7 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 20.0 · 73% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood insulin increased | 19 | 18.9 12.0–29.9ROR 18.9 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.8 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic foot | 98 | 17.5 14.3–21.4ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.9 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=95 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diabetic ulcer | 23 | 17.4 11.5–26.4ROR 17.4 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.5 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=22 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemia neonatal | 51 | 17.4 13.2–23.0ROR 17.4 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.8 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=50 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) | 1,526 | 17.2 16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 15.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood glucose increased | 10,008 | 29.6 29.1–30.1ROR 39.3 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 28.1 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 30.6 · 90% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood glucose decreased | 3,299 | 38.9 37.6–40.3ROR 42.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 36.3 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning synonym match | serious PRR 40.5 · 90% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 3,052 | 1.2 1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.474 | 1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2 | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.6 · 82% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Incorrect dose administered | 1,900 | 4.5 4.3–4.7ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.271 | 4.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.0 · 88% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) | 1,526 | 17.2 16.4–18.1ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 16.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 15.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 1,481 | 1.0 0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.304 | 1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Visual impairment | 1,369 | 6.0 5.7–6.3ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.141 | 5.9 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.8 · 93% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Weight decreased (weight loss) | 1,305 | 2.5 2.4–2.6ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.796 | 2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 2.4 · 71% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 1,279 | 1.2 1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.445 | 1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2 | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 1.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fall | 1,235 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.948 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 1,191 | 1.0 0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.295 | 1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malaise (feeling unwell) | 1,148 | 1.4 1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.574 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.4 · 81% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Wrong technique in product usage process | 1,143 | 3.0 2.8–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.603 | 3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 4.5 · 89% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dizziness | 1,095 | 1.2 1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.421 | 1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1 | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.3 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 1,053 | 0.7 0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.136 | 0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 0.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Hypoglycaemia unawareness — n=69, PRR 126.1
- Shock hypoglycaemic — n=71, PRR 93.0
- Coronary artery surgery — n=34, PRR 64.9
- Hypoglycaemic unconsciousness — n=159, PRR 46.1
- Multi-organ disorder — n=130, PRR 37.1
- Neuropathic arthropathy — n=37, PRR 32.3
- Intercepted drug dispensing error — n=74, PRR 27.4
- Intercepted product selection error — n=61, PRR 27.0
- Stress symptoms — n=21, PRR 25.6
- Large for dates baby — n=37, PRR 23.1
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Insulin glargine ↔ Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose decreased).
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Insulin Human?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Insulin Human are blood glucose increased, blood glucose decreased, hypoglycaemia, nausea, visual impairment, weight decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Insulin Human have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF ACUTE BRONCHOSPASM IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE Acute bronchospasm has been observed in AFREZZA-treated patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )]. AFREZZA is contraindicated in patients with chronic lung disease such as asthma or COPD [see Contraindications ( 4 )].
Do FAERS signals prove that Insulin Human causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 29f4637b-e204-425b-b89c-7238008d8c10, effective 20260530; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"INSULIN HUMAN") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,209 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
INSULIN HUMAN, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.