← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Mesna Injection side effects: what 8,213 FDA adverse event reports show

Mesna Injection · 998 reaction terms · 30,422 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cytoprotective agent

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

8,213 reports · 97% serious · 1,722 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

1. INDICATIONS AND USAGE Mesna injection is indicated as a prophylactic agent in reducing the incidence of ifosfamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Limitation of Use: Mesna injection is not indicated to reduce the risk of hematuria due to other pathological conditions such as thrombocytopenia.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

11. DESCRIPTION Mesna injection is a detoxifying agent to inhibit the hemorrhagic cystitis induced by ifosfamide. The active ingredient, mesna, USP is a synthetic sulfhydryl compound designated as sodium-2- sulphanylethanesulphonate with a molecular formula of C 2 H 5 NaO 3 S 2 and a molecular weight of 164.2.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 34
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 958 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
T-cell lymphoma refractory111,154.0
565.5–2,355.1ROR 1,155.6 · χ² 7,917 / p <1e-300
332.9 EB05 198.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia40941.3
655.0–1,352.7ROR 945.9 · χ² 26,667 / p <1e-300
515.5 EB05 394.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40no trial data cached
Thymus hypoplasia42826.2
583.4–1,169.9ROR 830.4 · χ² 25,446 / p <1e-300
484.3 EB05 373.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42no trial data cached
Human bocavirus infection23351.0
227.0–542.6ROR 352.0 · χ² 6,741 / p <1e-300
245.4 EB05 172.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Secondary immunodeficiency91210.6
170.2–260.5ROR 212.9 · χ² 17,326 / p <1e-300
186.8 EB05 156.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=91no trial data cached
Mycobacterium chelonae infection52194.0
146.4–257.0ROR 195.2 · χ² 9,091 / p <1e-300
169.1 EB05 133.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52no trial data cached
Pseudomonal sepsis109168.4
138.9–204.2ROR 170.6 · χ² 16,844 / p <1e-300
153.7 EB05 130.9 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=109no trial data cached
Cystitis bacterial21167.9
108.0–261.0ROR 168.3 · χ² 3,111 / p <1e-300
138.0 EB05 95.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21no trial data cached
Norovirus test positive20167.9
106.8–263.8ROR 168.3 · χ² 2,955 / p <1e-300
137.1 EB05 93.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20no trial data cached
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome18164.2
102.0–264.4ROR 164.6 · χ² 2,590 / p <1e-300
132.8 EB05 88.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Cystitis viral23164.1
107.7–250.0ROR 164.5 · χ² 3,348 / p <1e-300
136.8 EB05 96.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=23no trial data cached
Sars-cov-2 test negative40158.6
115.3–218.2ROR 159.4 · χ² 5,746 / p <1e-300
139.5 EB05 106.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=40 · ♀ 13% (drug 47%) · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Anal inflammation37157.9
113.4–220.0ROR 158.6 · χ² 5,282 / p <1e-300
138.2 EB05 104.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Disseminated aspergillosis25143.7
96.1–214.9ROR 144.2 · χ² 3,218 / p <1e-300
123.4 EB05 87.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25no trial data cached
Cancer fatigue12142.5
79.7–254.9ROR 142.7 · χ² 1,465 / p <1e-300
111.5 EB05 68.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Engraft failure13121.7
69.8–212.2ROR 121.9 · χ² 1,371 / p 2e-300
99.6 EB05 61.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Red blood cell transfusion16106.3
64.5–175.2ROR 106.5 · χ² 1,502 / p <1e-300
91.2 EB05 59.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Herpes zoster reactivation10102.8
54.6–193.3ROR 102.9 · χ² 873 / p 4e-192
83.5 EB05 48.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Tumour compression12100.0
56.2–178.1ROR 100.2 · χ² 1,038 / p 4e-228
83.8 EB05 51.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Cystitis haemorrhagic14796.9
82.3–114.1ROR 98.6 · χ² 13,344 / p <1e-300
92.3 EB05 80.4 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=147 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Enterobacter bacteraemia1196.5
52.9–176.2ROR 96.6 · χ² 911 / p 2e-200
80.4 EB05 47.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Acute polyneuropathy1094.3
50.2–177.2ROR 94.4 · χ² 802 / p 9e-177
77.9 EB05 45.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Restrictive cardiomyopathy1086.2
45.9–161.9ROR 86.3 · χ² 734 / p 6e-162
72.4 EB05 42.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Candida test positive1275.2
42.3–133.4ROR 75.3 · χ² 782 / p 2e-172
65.7 EB05 40.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=12no trial data cached
Fanconi syndrome4074.8
54.6–102.3ROR 75.1 · χ² 2,756 / p <1e-300
70.3 EB05 53.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Abscess bacterial1073.4
39.2–137.6ROR 73.5 · χ² 625 / p 3e-138
63.2 EB05 36.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Platelet transfusion3469.8
49.7–98.0ROR 70.1 · χ² 2,176 / p <1e-300
65.5 EB05 49.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Mantle cell lymphoma recurrent1167.2
37.0–122.3ROR 67.3 · χ² 636 / p 1e-140
59.1 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Venoocclusive disease6163.7
49.4–82.0ROR 64.1 · χ² 3,609 / p <1e-300
61.0 EB05 49.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 15% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Metastases to the mediastinum1062.9
33.6–117.9ROR 63.0 · χ² 536 / p 8e-119
55.3 EB05 32.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Engraftment syndrome1462.3
36.7–105.8ROR 62.4 · χ² 765 / p 1e-168
56.4 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Parainfluenzae virus infection3660.8
43.7–84.5ROR 61.0 · χ² 2,008 / p <1e-300
57.6 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Enterobacter infection3655.9
40.2–77.7ROR 56.2 · χ² 1,846 / p <1e-300
53.3 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Aplastic anaemia11054.7
45.3–66.0ROR 55.4 · χ² 5,623 / p <1e-300
53.1 EB05 45.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=110 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral toxoplasmosis1952.9
33.6–83.3ROR 53.0 · χ² 898 / p 1e-197
49.4 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia1,27450.1
47.6–52.7ROR 59.1 · χ² 60,203 / p <1e-300
49.1 EB05 46.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Fusarium infection1349.4
28.6–85.6ROR 49.5 · χ² 559 / p 9e-124
45.5 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Scrotal pain1048.1
25.8–90.0ROR 48.2 · χ² 408 / p 5e-91
43.6 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus viraemia7946.9
37.6–58.5ROR 47.4 · χ² 3,441 / p <1e-300
45.6 EB05 37.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 25% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Aplasia3646.8
33.7–65.1ROR 47.0 · χ² 1,541 / p <1e-300
45.0 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Febrile neutropenia1,27450.1
47.6–52.7ROR 59.1 · χ² 60,203 / p <1e-300
49.1 EB05 46.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)6471.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · χ² 288 / p 6e-65
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))57410.9
10.0–11.7ROR 11.6 · χ² 5,138 / p <1e-300
10.8 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)3979.1
8.3–10.0ROR 9.5 · χ² 2,866 / p <1e-300
9.0 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 5.5 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)3915.2
4.8–5.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,346 / p 6e-295
5.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Vomiting3782.1
1.9–2.3ROR 2.1 · χ² 209 / p 1e-47
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Nausea3631.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 10 / p 1e-3
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)3588.2
7.4–9.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 2,265 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3401.3
1.2–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)2852.3
2.0–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 200 / p 1e-45
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Disease progression2796.1
5.4–6.8ROR 6.2 · χ² 1,175 / p 8e-258
6.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Death2520.7
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.4 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Mesna?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Mesna are febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Mesna have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Mesna has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Mesna causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.