← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Mesna side effects: what 8,368 FDA adverse event reports show

Mesna · 1,000 reaction terms · 30,905 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cytoprotective agent

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

8,368 reports · 97% serious · 1,746 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

1. INDICATIONS AND USAGE Mesna injection is indicated as a prophylactic agent in reducing the incidence of ifosfamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Limitation of Use: Mesna injection is not indicated to reduce the risk of hematuria due to other pathological conditions such as thrombocytopenia.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

11. DESCRIPTION Mesna injection is a detoxifying agent to inhibit the hemorrhagic cystitis induced by ifosfamide. The active ingredient, mesna, USP is a synthetic sulfhydryl compound designated as sodium-2- sulphanylethanesulphonate with a molecular formula of C 2 H 5 NaO 3 S 2 and a molecular weight of 164.2.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 33
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 960 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
T-cell lymphoma refractory111,132.7
555.0–2,311.5ROR 1,134.1 · χ² 7,770 / p <1e-300
330.3 EB05 196.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia40923.8
642.9–1,327.6ROR 928.3 · χ² 26,172 / p <1e-300
508.3 EB05 389.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40no trial data cached
Thymus hypoplasia42810.9
572.6–1,148.3ROR 815.0 · χ² 24,973 / p <1e-300
477.3 EB05 368.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42no trial data cached
Human bocavirus infection23344.5
222.8–532.6ROR 345.4 · χ² 6,615 / p <1e-300
241.8 EB05 169.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Secondary immunodeficiency91206.7
167.1–255.7ROR 209.0 · χ² 17,001 / p <1e-300
183.5 EB05 154.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=91no trial data cached
Mycobacterium chelonae infection52190.4
143.7–252.2ROR 191.6 · χ² 8,920 / p <1e-300
166.1 EB05 131.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52no trial data cached
Pseudomonal sepsis110166.9
137.7–202.2ROR 169.1 · χ² 16,836 / p <1e-300
152.3 EB05 129.9 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=110no trial data cached
Cystitis bacterial21164.7
106.0–256.1ROR 165.2 · χ² 3,053 / p <1e-300
135.7 EB05 93.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21no trial data cached
Norovirus test positive20164.7
104.8–258.9ROR 165.1 · χ² 2,900 / p <1e-300
134.9 EB05 92.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20no trial data cached
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome18161.2
100.1–259.5ROR 161.5 · χ² 2,541 / p <1e-300
130.7 EB05 87.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Cystitis viral23161.0
105.7–245.4ROR 161.5 · χ² 3,285 / p <1e-300
134.6 EB05 94.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=23no trial data cached
Sars-cov-2 test negative40155.7
113.2–214.1ROR 156.4 · χ² 5,638 / p <1e-300
137.0 EB05 105.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=40 · ♀ 13% (drug 47%) · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Anal inflammation37155.0
111.3–215.9ROR 155.7 · χ² 5,183 / p <1e-300
135.8 EB05 102.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 47%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Disseminated aspergillosis25141.1
94.3–210.9ROR 141.5 · χ² 3,158 / p <1e-300
121.3 EB05 86.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25no trial data cached
Cancer fatigue12139.9
78.2–250.1ROR 140.1 · χ² 1,437 / p <1e-300
109.8 EB05 66.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Engraft failure13119.4
68.5–208.3ROR 119.6 · χ² 1,345 / p 7e-295
98.0 EB05 60.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Red blood cell transfusion16104.3
63.3–172.0ROR 104.5 · χ² 1,473 / p <1e-300
89.7 EB05 58.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Herpes zoster reactivation10100.9
53.6–189.8ROR 101.0 · χ² 856 / p 1e-188
82.2 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Tumour compression1298.2
55.2–174.8ROR 98.3 · χ² 1,019 / p 7e-224
82.5 EB05 50.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Cystitis haemorrhagic14996.4
82.0–113.4ROR 98.2 · χ² 13,456 / p <1e-300
91.8 EB05 80.1 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=149 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Enterobacter bacteraemia1194.7
51.9–172.9ROR 94.8 · χ² 894 / p 9e-197
79.2 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Acute polyneuropathy1092.6
49.2–173.9ROR 92.7 · χ² 787 / p 2e-173
76.7 EB05 44.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Restrictive cardiomyopathy1084.6
45.1–158.9ROR 84.7 · χ² 720 / p 6e-159
71.2 EB05 41.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Fanconi syndrome4175.3
55.2–102.6ROR 75.6 · χ² 2,845 / p <1e-300
70.8 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Candida test positive1273.8
41.6–130.9ROR 73.9 · χ² 767 / p 4e-169
64.6 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=12no trial data cached
Abscess bacterial1072.0
38.4–135.1ROR 72.1 · χ² 613 / p 1e-135
62.1 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Platelet transfusion3468.5
48.7–96.2ROR 68.8 · χ² 2,135 / p <1e-300
64.4 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Mantle cell lymphoma recurrent1166.0
36.3–120.0ROR 66.1 · χ² 624 / p 6e-138
58.2 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Venoocclusive disease6263.5
49.4–81.7ROR 64.0 · χ² 3,659 / p <1e-300
60.9 EB05 49.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · ♀ 14% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Metastases to the mediastinum1061.8
33.0–115.7ROR 61.9 · χ² 526 / p 1e-116
54.4 EB05 31.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Engraftment syndrome1461.1
36.0–103.8ROR 61.2 · χ² 750 / p 2e-165
55.4 EB05 35.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Parainfluenzae virus infection3659.6
42.9–82.9ROR 59.9 · χ² 1,970 / p <1e-300
56.6 EB05 42.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Enterobacter infection3654.9
39.5–76.3ROR 55.1 · χ² 1,811 / p <1e-300
52.3 EB05 39.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial data cached
Aplastic anaemia11053.7
44.5–64.7ROR 54.4 · χ² 5,515 / p <1e-300
52.1 EB05 44.4 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=110 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral toxoplasmosis1951.9
33.0–81.8ROR 52.1 · χ² 880 / p 9e-194
48.6 EB05 32.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia1,28349.5
47.0–52.1ROR 58.3 · χ² 59,897 / p <1e-300
48.5 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.8 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Fusarium infection1348.5
28.0–84.0ROR 48.6 · χ² 548 / p 2e-121
44.7 EB05 27.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Scrotal pain1047.3
25.3–88.3ROR 47.3 · χ² 400 / p 3e-89
42.9 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Amniotic fluid volume decreased1046.1
24.7–86.2ROR 46.2 · χ² 390 / p 4e-87
41.9 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=10no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus viraemia7946.0
36.9–57.5ROR 46.5 · χ² 3,374 / p <1e-300
44.8 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 25% (drug 47%)no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Febrile neutropenia1,28349.5
47.0–52.1ROR 58.3 · χ² 59,897 / p <1e-300
48.5 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.8 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)6591.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · χ² 293 / p 4e-66
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))58410.8
10.0–11.7ROR 11.6 · χ² 5,218 / p <1e-300
10.8 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)4025.3
4.8–5.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,403 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)3999.0
8.2–9.9ROR 9.4 · χ² 2,832 / p <1e-300
8.9 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 5.4 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Vomiting3812.0
1.8–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Nausea3711.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 10 / p 7e-4
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)3618.1
7.3–9.0ROR 8.4 · χ² 2,254 / p <1e-300
8.0 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3411.3
1.2–1.5ROR 1.3 · χ² 28 / p 5e-8
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)2922.3
2.0–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 208 / p 2e-47
2.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Disease progression2795.9
5.3–6.7ROR 6.1 · χ² 1,145 / p 3e-251
5.9 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.0 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Death2580.8
0.7–0.8ROR 0.7 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.4no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Mesna?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Mesna are febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Mesna have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Mesna has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Mesna causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.