← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

N and A side effects: what 1,487 FDA adverse event reports show

N/A · 15 reaction terms · 873 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

No validated FDA label found

Who reports

1,487 reports · 94% serious · 391 with death outcome · 57% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

—

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 12 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 7Outcome field, not a reaction 1No label text to screen 4
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 3 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Therapy interrupted15832.4
27.9–37.5ROR 36.1 · χ² 4,776 / p <1e-300
32.2 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 43.6 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Therapy cessation11331.3
26.2–37.3ROR 33.7 · χ² 3,280 / p <1e-300
31.0 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 42.2no trial data cached
Spinal operation1618.7
11.5–30.4ROR 18.9 · χ² 250 / p 1e-56
18.1 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Surgery7217.5
14.0–22.0ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,108 / p 3e-243
17.4 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.2 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Knee operation913.1
6.8–25.1ROR 13.2 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
10.8 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Knee arthroplasty1510.2
6.1–16.8ROR 10.2 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
8.8 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission189.3
5.9–14.7ROR 9.4 · χ² 125 / p 3e-29
8.1 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Hospitalisation958.8
7.2–10.7ROR 9.3 · χ² 653 / p 2e-144
8.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Hip arthroplasty76.5
3.1–13.6ROR 6.5 · χ² 27 / p 9e-8
4.8 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Pregnancy96.3
3.3–12.0ROR 6.3 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
4.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Death3465.7
5.2–6.2ROR 7.1 · χ² 1,381 / p <1e-300
5.6 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 3.5 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Dialysis55.0
2.1–11.9ROR 5.0 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
3.6 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3No label text to screenserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Death3465.7
5.2–6.2ROR 7.1 · χ² 1,381 / p <1e-300
5.6 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 3.5 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Therapy interrupted15832.4
27.9–37.5ROR 36.1 · χ² 4,776 / p <1e-300
32.2 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 43.6 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Therapy cessation11331.3
26.2–37.3ROR 33.7 · χ² 3,280 / p <1e-300
31.0 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 42.2no trial data cached
Hospitalisation958.8
7.2–10.7ROR 9.3 · χ² 653 / p 2e-144
8.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Surgery7217.5
14.0–22.0ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,108 / p 3e-243
17.4 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.2 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional dose omission189.3
5.9–14.7ROR 9.4 · χ² 125 / p 3e-29
8.1 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Spinal operation1618.7
11.5–30.4ROR 18.9 · χ² 250 / p 1e-56
18.1 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Knee arthroplasty1510.2
6.1–16.8ROR 10.2 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
8.8 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Pregnancy96.3
3.3–12.0ROR 6.3 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
4.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Knee operation913.1
6.8–25.1ROR 13.2 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
10.8 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Hip arthroplasty76.5
3.1–13.6ROR 6.5 · χ² 27 / p 9e-8
4.8 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Dialysis55.0
2.1–11.9ROR 5.0 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
3.6 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3No label text to screenserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Hospice care45.7
2.2–15.2ROR 5.7 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
3.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.1No label text to screenserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process30.9
0.3–2.9ROR 0.9 · χ² 0 / p 0.443
1.0 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -2.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Abortion induced34.5
1.4–13.9ROR 4.5 · χ² 5 / p 0.013
3.0 EB05 1.2 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screenserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of N and A?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for N and A are knee arthroplasty, pregnancy, hip arthroplasty, dialysis, hospice care, abortion induced. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does N and A have an FDA boxed warning?

No validated FDA label could be retrieved for this product name, so this page cannot say.

Do FAERS signals prove that N and A causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.