← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Somatropin side effects: what 72,108 FDA adverse event reports show

Somatropin · Zomacton · 1,168 reaction terms · 188,579 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Recombinant human growth hormone

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Zomacton

openFDA label

Who reports

72,108 reports · 25% serious · 1,365 with death outcome · 40% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ZOMACTON is a recombinant human growth hormone indicated for: Pediatric: Treatment of pediatric patients with growth failure due to inadequate secretion of endogenous growth hormone (GH), short stature associated with Turner syndrome, idiopathic short .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Somatropin is a human growth hormone (GH) produced by recombinant DNA technology using Escherichia coli. The protein is comprised of 191 amino acid residues and has a molecular weight of about 22,124 daltons. The amino acid sequence is identical to that of human growth hormone of pituitary origin.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 16Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,128 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device information output issue6,5282,690.2
2,487.4–2,909.6ROR 2,954.2 · calibrated p 3e-23 ✓
256.2 EB05 251.0 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=97 · 84% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device chemical property issue511,107.5
602.4–2,036.0ROR 1,108.2 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
208.2 EB05 164.5 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact76% consumernot reported in cached trials
Non-secretory adenoma of pituitary13917.5
299.2–2,813.7ROR 917.6 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
164.7 EB05 102.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Device calibration failure31437.6
249.4–767.6ROR 437.7 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
155.8 EB05 115.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device mechanical issue7,685429.5
414.8–444.7ROR 479.9 · calibrated p 9e-14 ✓
170.9 EB05 167.7 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=174 · 83% consumernot reported in cached trials
Patient-device interaction issue16410.6
190.6–884.7ROR 410.7 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
140.2 EB05 91.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Craniopharyngioma185352.9
284.3–438.0ROR 353.8 · calibrated p 3e-12 ✓
154.9 EB05 137.0 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=184NCT01088412: 19/21,177 (0.1%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Device power source issue1,561348.9
324.1–375.6ROR 356.5 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
156.3 EB05 149.9 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=22 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Expired device used1,448229.9
214.6–246.3ROR 234.5 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
126.9 EB05 121.6 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=81 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Insulin-like growth factor decreased216197.3
165.9–234.8ROR 197.9 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
115.4 EB05 103.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=48NCT01088412: 1/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Device user interface issue13183.5
91.3–368.9ROR 183.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
96.2 EB05 59.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–not reported in cached trials
Device physical property issue2,902182.7
174.5–191.3ROR 190.2 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
111.2 EB05 107.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=42 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Poor quality device used3,207165.7
158.7–173.0ROR 173.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
104.7 EB05 101.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=124 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug administered in wrong device345161.5
141.5–184.3ROR 162.3 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
102.5 EB05 93.8 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Epiphysiolysis89160.0
123.4–207.5ROR 160.2 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
100.3 EB05 84.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=86NCT01088412: 11/21,177 (0.1%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Device material issue717157.9
144.1–172.9ROR 159.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
101.3 EB05 95.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Glioneuronal tumour19153.2
87.7–267.9ROR 153.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
90.8 EB05 61.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Blood growth hormone decreased70150.8
112.9–201.6ROR 151.0 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
96.1 EB05 78.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=21 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Circumstance or information capable of leading to device use error767139.2
127.7–151.8ROR 140.7 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
93.4 EB05 87.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device material opacification14127.5
67.8–239.6ROR 127.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
79.0 EB05 50.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–not reported in cached trials
Insulin-like growth factor increased386106.0
94.3–119.1ROR 106.6 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
77.1 EB05 70.8 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=135NCT01088412: 1/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Septo-optic dysplasia18105.9
61.6–182.0ROR 105.9 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
71.6 EB05 47.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Wrong device used173104.6
87.8–124.5ROR 104.8 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
76.0 EB05 66.9 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=32 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device leakage10,55095.4
93.4–97.4ROR 111.3 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
71.5 EB05 70.4 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=278 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug dose omission by device18,29790.1
88.8–91.5ROR 119.9 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
68.6 EB05 67.7 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=461 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device breakage9,38090.1
88.1–92.1ROR 103.2 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
68.5 EB05 67.4 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.3 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Germ cell cancer3178.1
52.5–116.3ROR 78.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
59.3 EB05 43.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 100% clinicianNCT01088412: 1/12,692 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Inadvertent injection air bubble2477.9
49.6–122.4ROR 77.9 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
58.5 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Adenoidal hypertrophy7773.7
57.3–94.7ROR 73.8 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
57.8 EB05 47.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · 91% clinicianNCT01088412: 5/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Product knowledge deficit11170.4
57.2–86.7ROR 70.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
56.0 EB05 47.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact89% consumernot reported in cached trials
Product reconstitution quality issue16668.2
57.6–80.8ROR 68.4 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
54.8 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Blood 25-hydroxycholecalciferol decreased5566.6
49.7–89.4ROR 66.7 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
53.2 EB05 42.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Medulloblastoma recurrent2164.4
40.1–103.5ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
50.4 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21NCT01088412: 4/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Osteochondroma2264.0
40.3–101.7ROR 64.0 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
50.2 EB05 35.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18NCT01088412: 1/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Medulloblastoma2557.4
37.3–88.2ROR 57.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
46.3 EB05 33.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% clinicianNCT01088412: 1/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Hepatoblastoma1655.8
32.6–95.3ROR 55.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
44.4 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Device use issue2,77954.8
52.7–57.1ROR 57.0 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
46.1 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=126 · 83% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device electrical finding11354.3
44.4–66.5ROR 54.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
45.4 EB05 38.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Epiphyses premature fusion4652.2
38.1–71.4ROR 52.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
43.4 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Somatropin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (10 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug dose omission by device18,29790.1
88.8–91.5ROR 119.9 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
68.6 EB05 67.7 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=461 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device leakage10,55095.4
93.4–97.4ROR 111.3 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
71.5 EB05 70.4 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=278 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device breakage9,38090.1
88.1–92.1ROR 103.2 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
68.5 EB05 67.4 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.3 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device mechanical issue7,685429.5
414.8–444.7ROR 479.9 · calibrated p 9e-14 ✓
170.9 EB05 167.7 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=174 · 83% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device information output issue6,5282,690.2
2,487.4–2,909.6ROR 2,954.2 · calibrated p 3e-23 ✓
256.2 EB05 251.0 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=97 · 84% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device issue5,59919.6
19.1–20.2ROR 21.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
18.4 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.9 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Wrong technique in device usage process4,96134.9
33.9–35.9ROR 37.3 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
31.1 EB05 30.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=272 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Injection site pain (pain where injected)3,6773.5
3.4–3.6ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.451
3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.2 · 78% consumerNCT01088412: 4/21,177 (0.0%) on Somatropin (serious AE)
Device use error3,27830.5
29.4–31.6ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.6 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=87 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Poor quality device used3,207165.7
158.7–173.0ROR 173.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
104.7 EB05 101.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=124 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device physical property issue2,902182.7
174.5–191.3ROR 190.2 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
111.2 EB05 107.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=42 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Incorrect dose administered2,7933.6
3.5–3.7ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.438
3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.7 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Incorrect dose administered by device2,77935.2
33.9–36.6ROR 36.6 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
31.4 EB05 30.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=184 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device use issue2,77954.8
52.7–57.1ROR 57.0 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
46.1 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=126 · 83% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device delivery system issue2,35428.4
27.2–29.6ROR 29.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
25.9 EB05 25.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=98 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Somatropin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Somatropin are drug dose omission by device, injection site pain, poor quality device used. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Somatropin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Somatropin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Somatropin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.