Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate side effects: what 32,862 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Label matched
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate)
Who reports
32,862 reports · 94% serious · 1,940 with death outcome · 32% female
Used for
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are a nucleotide analog HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor and an HBV reverse transcriptase inhibitor. • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.
What it is
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablet a prodrug of tenofovir which is a fumaric acid salt of bis-isopropoxycarbonyloxymethyl ester derivative of tenofovir. In vivo tenofovir DF is converted to tenofovir, an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate (nucleotide) analog of adenosine 5’-monophosphate.
Boxed warning
WARNING: POSTTREATMENT EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis have been reported in HBV-infected patients who have discontinued anti-hepatitis B therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled — boxed warning The term (or its clinical synonym) appears in the FDA boxed warning: causality is regulator-recognised and considered serious.
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,075 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal injury | 8,332 | 2,623.1 2,501.1–2,751.0ROR 3,513.8 · calibrated p 2e-24 ✓ | 507.4 EB05 498.3 · IC025 +8.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 319.9 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Progressive external ophthalmoplegia | 86 | 1,257.4 872.1–1,813.0ROR 1,260.7 · calibrated p 2e-17 ✓ | 383.9 EB05 320.5 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=86 · ♀ 0% (drug 32%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Csf hiv virus identified | 14 | 978.0 423.3–2,259.3ROR 978.4 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓ | 251.8 EB05 159.4 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=14 | not reported in cached trials |
| Perinatal hbv infection | 10 | 898.1 341.9–2,359.4ROR 898.4 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓ | 217.3 EB05 126.1 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Csf virus identified | 35 | 647.2 403.8–1,037.4ROR 647.9 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓ | 272.0 EB05 204.4 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=35 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone loss | 7,079 | 563.0 546.3–580.3ROR 717.3 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓ | 297.3 EB05 291.5 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 198.0 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth injury | 2,013 | 549.1 517.7–582.3ROR 584.8 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓ | 292.7 EB05 282.2 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=2,009 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Multiple fractures | 6,838 | 451.7 438.7–465.0ROR 570.1 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓ | 263.1 EB05 257.9 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 171.5 · 98% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Ultrasound antenatal screen | 35 | 373.0 245.5–566.5ROR 373.4 · calibrated p 8e-12 ✓ | 208.0 EB05 156.3 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 · ♀ 55% (drug 32%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Protein total abnormal | 446 | 332.2 296.4–372.4ROR 336.8 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓ | 215.7 EB05 199.4 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=442 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone density decreased | 10,686 | 326.5 319.8–333.3ROR 483.4 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓ | 215.2 EB05 211.8 · IC025 +7.7 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 158.9 · 98% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Fanconi syndrome acquired | 575 | 313.5 283.8–346.3ROR 319.1 · calibrated p 6e-12 ✓ | 208.1 EB05 194.2 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=570 · 90% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hiv viraemia | 65 | 289.8 216.1–388.8ROR 290.4 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓ | 187.8 EB05 152.5 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=65 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal injury | 9,280 | 286.8 280.5–293.1ROR 399.2 · calibrated p 6e-13 ✓ | 197.2 EB05 193.8 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 121.0 · 97% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone demineralisation | 292 | 242.8 212.2–277.8ROR 245.0 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓ | 173.5 EB05 157.4 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=273 | not reported in cached trials |
| Mitochondrial toxicity | 202 | 208.2 177.6–244.0ROR 209.5 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 154.4 EB05 137.3 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=201 · ♀ 5% (drug 32%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Aids encephalopathy | 13 | 181.6 98.0–336.6ROR 181.7 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 117.3 EB05 72.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=13 | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteonecrosis (bone death) | 7,268 | 179.6 175.4–183.9ROR 230.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 139.9 EB05 137.2 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 86.3 · 91% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth loss | 4,531 | 177.2 171.8–182.8ROR 205.4 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 138.4 EB05 135.0 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 101.0 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Hepatitis d | 17 | 161.9 95.0–275.9ROR 162.0 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 112.9 EB05 74.7 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=17 | not reported in cached trials |
| Viral mutation identified | 735 | 157.8 145.6–170.9ROR 161.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓ | 125.9 EB05 118.5 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=733 · 98% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal tubular dysfunction | 110 | 156.8 127.3–193.2ROR 157.3 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 123.1 EB05 104.9 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=110 · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hepatitis b dna increased | 126 | 146.7 120.9–178.0ROR 147.3 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓ | 117.1 EB05 100.9 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=124 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hemivertebra | 31 | 141.2 95.7–208.5ROR 141.4 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 108.0 EB05 79.7 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=31 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hepatitis b dna assay positive | 23 | 140.4 89.3–220.6ROR 140.5 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 105.1 EB05 73.8 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=21 | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteomalacia | 249 | 121.4 106.0–138.9ROR 122.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 101.1 EB05 91.0 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=249 | not reported in cached trials |
| Virologic failure | 836 | 117.1 108.8–125.9ROR 120.1 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 98.6 EB05 93.1 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious n=830 · 98% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Aids related complication | 10 | 114.3 58.3–224.2ROR 114.3 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓ | 82.2 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteopenia | 2,263 | 111.2 106.5–116.1ROR 119.4 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 94.6 EB05 91.3 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 63.6 · 80% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Glomerular filtration rate abnormal | 204 | 108.3 93.4–125.6ROR 109.0 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 91.8 EB05 81.7 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=203 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypophosphataemic osteomalacia | 38 | 108.1 76.6–152.5ROR 108.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 88.4 EB05 67.2 · IC025 +4.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · ♀ 59% (drug 32%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated tuberculosis | 47 | 104.8 77.0–142.7ROR 104.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 86.9 EB05 68.0 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=47 · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Beta 2 microglobulin urine increased | 19 | 98.7 60.9–160.1ROR 98.8 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 78.9 EB05 53.4 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=18 | not reported in cached trials |
| Genotype drug resistance test positive | 137 | 97.0 81.1–116.1ROR 97.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 83.2 EB05 72.2 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=132 · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteoporosis | 5,405 | 96.4 93.9–99.0ROR 115.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 83.7 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 59.3 | not reported in cached trials |
| Lipodystrophy acquired | 277 | 95.2 84.0–108.0ROR 96.0 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 82.4 EB05 74.5 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=272 · ♀ 11% (drug 32%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Fanconi syndrome | 181 | 94.4 80.7–110.3ROR 94.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 81.5 EB05 72.0 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious n=180 · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Csf hiv escape syndrome | 18 | 94.3 57.5–154.8ROR 94.4 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓ | 75.8 EB05 50.7 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | not reported in cached trials |
| Chronic hepatitis b | 37 | 85.2 60.5–120.1ROR 85.3 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓ | 72.5 EB05 54.9 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 32%) · 92% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Birth mark | 24 | 82.0 53.6–125.5ROR 82.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 68.8 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Tenofovir Disoproxil as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT00557245 — Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV-1 Acquisition Within HIV-1 Discordant Couples (N=4758, PHASE3; 172 AE terms posted; arms: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF); Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumar; Placebo)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone density decreased | 10,686 | 326.5 319.8–333.3ROR 483.4 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓ | 215.2 EB05 211.8 · IC025 +7.7 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 158.9 · 98% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal injury | 9,280 | 286.8 280.5–293.1ROR 399.2 · calibrated p 6e-13 ✓ | 197.2 EB05 193.8 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 121.0 · 97% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Skeletal injury | 8,332 | 2,623.1 2,501.1–2,751.0ROR 3,513.8 · calibrated p 2e-24 ✓ | 507.4 EB05 498.3 · IC025 +8.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 319.9 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Chronic kidney disease | 7,304 | 67.2 65.8–68.7ROR 86.1 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 60.8 EB05 59.6 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 37.8 · 84% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteonecrosis (bone death) | 7,268 | 179.6 175.4–183.9ROR 230.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 139.9 EB05 137.2 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 86.3 · 91% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone loss | 7,079 | 563.0 546.3–580.3ROR 717.3 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓ | 297.3 EB05 291.5 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 198.0 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Multiple fractures | 6,838 | 451.7 438.7–465.0ROR 570.1 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓ | 263.1 EB05 257.9 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 171.5 · 98% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Renal failure (kidney failure) | 6,696 | 33.6 32.9–34.3ROR 41.9 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 31.9 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 19.7 · 71% consumer | NCT00557245: 1/1,584 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE) |
| Osteoporosis | 5,405 | 96.4 93.9–99.0ROR 115.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 83.7 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled — boxed warning exact term | serious PRR 59.3 | not reported in cached trials |
| Tooth loss | 4,531 | 177.2 171.8–182.8ROR 205.4 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 138.4 EB05 135.0 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 101.0 · 99% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain | 3,039 | 3.2 3.1–3.3ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.514 | 3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.9 · 83% consumer | NCT00557245: 2/1,579 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil; 2/1,584 (0.1%) control (serious AE) |
| Emotional distress | 2,860 | 15.4 14.8–15.9ROR 16.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 15.0 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.9 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Anxiety | 2,676 | 6.0 5.8–6.3ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.122 | 6.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.1 · 77% consumer | NCT00557245: 1/1,579 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE) |
| Anhedonia | 2,459 | 65.3 62.7–68.0ROR 70.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 59.2 EB05 57.3 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 38.1 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Osteopenia | 2,263 | 111.2 106.5–116.1ROR 119.4 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 94.6 EB05 91.3 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 63.6 · 80% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Progressive external ophthalmoplegia — n=86, PRR 1,257.4
- Tooth injury — n=2,013, PRR 549.1
- Ultrasound antenatal screen — n=35, PRR 373.0
- Fanconi syndrome acquired — n=575, PRR 313.5
- Hiv viraemia — n=65, PRR 289.8
- Bone demineralisation — n=292, PRR 242.8
- Mitochondrial toxicity — n=202, PRR 208.2
- Osteonecrosis — n=7,268, PRR 179.6
- Tooth loss — n=4,531, PRR 177.2
- Viral mutation identified — n=735, PRR 157.8
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ↔ Bone loss.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Tenofovir Disoproxil?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tenofovir Disoproxil are bone density decreased, renal injury, skeletal injury, chronic kidney disease, osteonecrosis, bone loss. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Tenofovir Disoproxil have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: WARNING: POSTTREATMENT EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis have been reported in HBV-infected patients who have discontinued anti-hepatitis B therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.
Do FAERS signals prove that Tenofovir Disoproxil causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 08a30772-02fc-4f63-e063-6394a90afd43, effective 20251009; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,115 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.