← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate side effects: what 32,862 FDA adverse event reports show

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate · 1,115 reaction terms · 157,846 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

32,862 reports · 94% serious · 1,940 with death outcome · 32% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are a nucleotide analog HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor and an HBV reverse transcriptase inhibitor. • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablet a prodrug of tenofovir which is a fumaric acid salt of bis-isopropoxycarbonyloxymethyl ester derivative of tenofovir. In vivo tenofovir DF is converted to tenofovir, an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate (nucleotide) analog of adenosine 5’-monophosphate.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

WARNING: POSTTREATMENT EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis have been reported in HBV-infected patients who have discontinued anti-hepatitis B therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 4Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 7Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,075 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Progressive external ophthalmoplegia861,257.4
872.1–1,813.0ROR 1,260.7 · calibrated p 2e-17 ✓
383.9 EB05 320.5 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=86 · ♀ 0% (drug 32%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Perinatal hbv infection10898.1
341.9–2,359.4ROR 898.4 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
217.3 EB05 126.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Bone loss7,079563.0
546.3–580.3ROR 717.3 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓
297.3 EB05 291.5 · IC025 +8.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 198.0 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tooth injury2,013549.1
517.7–582.3ROR 584.8 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓
292.7 EB05 282.2 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2,009 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Ultrasound antenatal screen35373.0
245.5–566.5ROR 373.4 · calibrated p 8e-12 ✓
208.0 EB05 156.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 55% (drug 32%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Protein total abnormal446332.2
296.4–372.4ROR 336.8 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓
215.7 EB05 199.4 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=442 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bone density decreased10,686326.5
319.8–333.3ROR 483.4 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓
215.2 EB05 211.8 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 158.9 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fanconi syndrome acquired575313.5
283.8–346.3ROR 319.1 · calibrated p 6e-12 ✓
208.1 EB05 194.2 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=570 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hiv viraemia65289.8
216.1–388.8ROR 290.4 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
187.8 EB05 152.5 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone demineralisation292242.8
212.2–277.8ROR 245.0 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓
173.5 EB05 157.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=273not reported in cached trials
Mitochondrial toxicity202208.2
177.6–244.0ROR 209.5 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
154.4 EB05 137.3 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=201 · ♀ 5% (drug 32%)not reported in cached trials
Aids encephalopathy13181.6
98.0–336.6ROR 181.7 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
117.3 EB05 72.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Osteonecrosis (bone death)7,268179.6
175.4–183.9ROR 230.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
139.9 EB05 137.2 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 86.3 · 91% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tooth loss4,531177.2
171.8–182.8ROR 205.4 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
138.4 EB05 135.0 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 101.0 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hepatitis d17161.9
95.0–275.9ROR 162.0 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
112.9 EB05 74.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=17not reported in cached trials
Viral mutation identified735157.8
145.6–170.9ROR 161.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
125.9 EB05 118.5 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=733 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hepatitis b dna increased126146.7
120.9–178.0ROR 147.3 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
117.1 EB05 100.9 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=124not reported in cached trials
Hemivertebra31141.2
95.7–208.5ROR 141.4 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
108.0 EB05 79.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31not reported in cached trials
Hepatitis b dna assay positive23140.4
89.3–220.6ROR 140.5 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
105.1 EB05 73.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=21not reported in cached trials
Osteomalacia249121.4
106.0–138.9ROR 122.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
101.1 EB05 91.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=249not reported in cached trials
Virologic failure836117.1
108.8–125.9ROR 120.1 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
98.6 EB05 93.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=830 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aids related complication10114.3
58.3–224.2ROR 114.3 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
82.2 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Osteopenia2,263111.2
106.5–116.1ROR 119.4 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
94.6 EB05 91.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 63.6 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Glomerular filtration rate abnormal204108.3
93.4–125.6ROR 109.0 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
91.8 EB05 81.7 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=203not reported in cached trials
Hypophosphataemic osteomalacia38108.1
76.6–152.5ROR 108.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
88.4 EB05 67.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · ♀ 59% (drug 32%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Beta 2 microglobulin urine increased1998.7
60.9–160.1ROR 98.8 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
78.9 EB05 53.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Genotype drug resistance test positive13797.0
81.1–116.1ROR 97.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
83.2 EB05 72.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=132 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Osteoporosis5,40596.4
93.9–99.0ROR 115.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
83.7 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 59.3not reported in cached trials
Lipodystrophy acquired27795.2
84.0–108.0ROR 96.0 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
82.4 EB05 74.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=272 · ♀ 11% (drug 32%)not reported in cached trials
Fanconi syndrome18194.4
80.7–110.3ROR 94.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
81.5 EB05 72.0 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious n=180 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Csf hiv escape syndrome1894.3
57.5–154.8ROR 94.4 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
75.8 EB05 50.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Chronic hepatitis b3785.2
60.5–120.1ROR 85.3 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
72.5 EB05 54.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 32%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Birth mark2482.0
53.6–125.5ROR 82.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
68.8 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Tenofovir Disoproxil as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Bone density decreased10,686326.5
319.8–333.3ROR 483.4 · calibrated p 8e-14 ✓
215.2 EB05 211.8 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 158.9 · 98% consumernot reported in cached trials
Osteonecrosis (bone death)7,268179.6
175.4–183.9ROR 230.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
139.9 EB05 137.2 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 86.3 · 91% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bone loss7,079563.0
546.3–580.3ROR 717.3 · calibrated p 1e-15 ✓
297.3 EB05 291.5 · IC025 +8.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 198.0 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Renal failure (kidney failure)6,69633.6
32.9–34.3ROR 41.9 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
31.9 EB05 31.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 19.7 · 71% consumerNCT00557245: 1/1,584 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE)
Osteoporosis5,40596.4
93.9–99.0ROR 115.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
83.7 EB05 81.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 59.3not reported in cached trials
Tooth loss4,531177.2
171.8–182.8ROR 205.4 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
138.4 EB05 135.0 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 101.0 · 99% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pain3,0393.2
3.1–3.3ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.514
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9 · 83% consumerNCT00557245: 2/1,579 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil; 2/1,584 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Emotional distress2,86015.4
14.8–15.9ROR 16.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
15.0 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Anxiety2,6766.0
5.8–6.3ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.122
6.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.1 · 77% consumerNCT00557245: 1/1,579 (0.1%) on Tenofovir Disoproxil (serious AE)
Anhedonia2,45965.3
62.7–68.0ROR 70.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
59.2 EB05 57.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.1 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Osteopenia2,263111.2
106.5–116.1ROR 119.4 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
94.6 EB05 91.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 63.6 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ↔ Bone loss.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Tenofovir Disoproxil?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tenofovir Disoproxil are bone density decreased, renal injury, skeletal injury, chronic kidney disease, osteonecrosis, bone loss. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Tenofovir Disoproxil have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: WARNING: POSTTREATMENT EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis have been reported in HBV-infected patients who have discontinued anti-hepatitis B therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.

Do FAERS signals prove that Tenofovir Disoproxil causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.