← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Vincristine side effects: what 29,131 FDA adverse event reports show

Vincristine Sulfate · 1,116 reaction terms · 97,345 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Vincristine Sulfate (Vincristine Sulfate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

29,131 reports · 97% serious · 5,379 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Vincristine Sulfate Injection is indicated in acute leukemia. Vincristine Sulfate Injection has also been shown to be useful in combination with other oncolytic agents in Hodgkin's disease, non–Hodgkin's malignant lymphomas, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and Wilms' tumor.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Vincristine Sulfate Injection, USP is the salt of an alkaloid obtained from a common flowering herb, the periwinkle plant ( Vinca rosea Linn). Originally known as leurocristine, it has also been referred to as LCR and VCR.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Caution–This preparation should be administered by individuals experienced in the administration of Vincristine Sulfate Injection. It is extremely important that the intravenous needle or catheter be properly positioned before any vincristine is injected.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 9Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 25
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,076 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Human bocavirus infection92679.7
510.8–904.5ROR 681.9 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓
324.1 EB05 272.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=92 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia61503.1
362.5–698.3ROR 504.1 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
269.8 EB05 217.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=61no trial arm names this drug
Thymus hypoplasia66450.1
330.7–612.6ROR 451.1 · calibrated p 6e-13 ✓
255.4 EB05 207.7 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66no trial arm names this drug
Picornavirus infection14413.7
214.1–799.8ROR 413.9 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
193.1 EB05 122.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial arm names this drug
Follicular lymphoma recurrent25385.5
236.9–627.3ROR 385.8 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
210.1 EB05 149.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=25 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome18311.4
178.9–541.9ROR 311.6 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
176.4 EB05 118.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=18no trial arm names this drug
Cystitis bacterial71190.0
146.3–246.9ROR 190.5 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
144.3 EB05 118.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=71no trial arm names this drug
Norovirus test positive67187.8
143.5–245.8ROR 188.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
142.7 EB05 116.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=67no trial arm names this drug
Bacillus test positive19168.5
102.2–277.8ROR 168.6 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
120.2 EB05 81.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Enterovirus test positive33168.4
115.2–246.1ROR 168.6 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
126.5 EB05 94.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=30 · ♀ 70% (drug 45%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Secondary immunodeficiency211154.6
133.3–179.4ROR 155.7 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
125.7 EB05 112.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=211 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Mycobacterium chelonae infection126148.7
122.8–180.1ROR 149.3 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
120.9 EB05 104.2 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=126no trial arm names this drug
Leukoerythroblastosis17145.3
86.2–244.8ROR 145.4 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
106.6 EB05 70.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial arm names this drug
Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma recurrent323127.5
113.3–143.4ROR 128.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
107.5 EB05 98.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=323no trial arm names this drug
Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma refractory139126.6
105.7–151.5ROR 127.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
106.0 EB05 92.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=139no trial arm names this drug
Abscess bacterial49114.3
84.6–154.6ROR 114.5 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
95.0 EB05 74.7 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49no trial arm names this drug
Treatment related secondary malignancy28113.5
76.2–169.1ROR 113.6 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
92.0 EB05 66.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Mantle cell lymphoma recurrent56108.2
81.7–143.3ROR 108.4 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
91.2 EB05 72.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=56 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Stomatococcal infection16108.1
63.9–182.9ROR 108.1 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
84.7 EB05 55.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial arm names this drug
Central hypothyroidism3797.9
69.5–138.1ROR 98.0 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
82.6 EB05 62.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37 · ♀ 79% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Smooth muscle cell neoplasm4996.5
71.6–130.1ROR 96.7 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
82.4 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 45%) · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Nephroblastoma1595.0
55.4–162.8ROR 95.0 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
76.1 EB05 48.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial arm names this drug
Adenoviral hepatitis2690.8
60.4–136.6ROR 90.9 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
76.3 EB05 54.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26no trial arm names this drug
Meningitis tuberculous6390.6
69.7–117.8ROR 90.8 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
78.6 EB05 63.6 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Human rhinovirus test positive3984.1
60.3–117.2ROR 84.2 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
72.7 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=36 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Caecitis4782.7
61.2–111.9ROR 82.9 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
72.1 EB05 56.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 66% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Corona virus infection4480.9
59.2–110.4ROR 81.0 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
70.5 EB05 54.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44no trial arm names this drug
Follicular lymphoma7771.4
56.5–90.2ROR 71.6 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
64.0 EB05 52.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=76 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Antithrombin iii decreased2470.9
46.6–107.9ROR 71.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
61.6 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial arm names this drug
Pseudomonal sepsis14866.0
55.8–78.1ROR 66.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.0 EB05 52.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=148 · ♀ 68% (drug 45%)no trial arm names this drug
Pseudomonas test positive6965.7
51.3–84.0ROR 65.8 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
59.3 EB05 48.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=68 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Blood culture positive24964.4
56.6–73.3ROR 65.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
58.9 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=240 · 99% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Haemofiltration1562.6
36.9–106.1ROR 62.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
53.9 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial arm names this drug
Central nervous system fungal infection1761.8
37.7–101.5ROR 61.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
53.7 EB05 35.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial arm names this drug
Lymphoma transformation2860.5
41.2–89.0ROR 60.6 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
53.9 EB05 39.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=28no trial arm names this drug
Lennox-gastaut syndrome1758.8
35.9–96.4ROR 58.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
51.4 EB05 34.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial arm names this drug
Coombs positive haemolytic anaemia3558.7
41.6–82.8ROR 58.8 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
52.8 EB05 39.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 45%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Parainfluenzae virus infection11658.3
48.2–70.4ROR 58.5 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
53.5 EB05 45.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=116no trial arm names this drug
High-grade b-cell lymphoma1457.7
33.5–99.5ROR 57.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
50.0 EB05 31.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=14no trial arm names this drug
Hypofibrinogenaemia7257.7
45.4–73.4ROR 57.8 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
52.7 EB05 43.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72 · 99% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Vincristine only as a background or rescue medication (NCT01190930, NCT02883049); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Febrile neutropenia4,41851.4
50.0–52.9ROR 60.4 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
48.0 EB05 46.8 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.6 · 98% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))1,7429.4
8.9–9.8ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
9.2 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,7181.4
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.610
1.4 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.6 · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Sepsis (blood infection)1,1017.2
6.8–7.6ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.084
7.1 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Vomiting1,0211.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.700
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4 · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Disease progression1,0076.2
5.8–6.6ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.128
6.1 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.1 · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Nausea9580.9
0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.225
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.0no trial arm names this drug
Pneumonia (lung infection)9292.1
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.999
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3 · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hypotension (low blood pressure)8793.2
3.0–3.4ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.555
3.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)8525.5
5.2–5.9ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.174
5.5 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Death8340.7
0.7–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.125
0.7 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 0.4no trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8270.5
0.4–0.5ROR 0.4 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
0.5 EB05 0.4 · IC025 -1.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.8 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anaemia (low red blood cells)8273.1
2.9–3.3ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.568
3.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.0 · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Vincristine (vinca alkaloids) ↔ Peripheral neuropathy.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Vincristine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Vincristine are febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, neutropenia, sepsis, vomiting, nausea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Vincristine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Caution–This preparation should be administered by individuals experienced in the administration of Vincristine Sulfate Injection. It is extremely important that the intravenous needle or catheter be properly positioned before any vincristine is injected.

Do FAERS signals prove that Vincristine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.