← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Voriconazole Injection side effects: what 21,588 FDA adverse event reports show

Voriconazole Injection · 1,105 reaction terms · 78,039 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Azole Antifungal

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

21,588 reports · 94% serious · 6,336 with death outcome · 39% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Voriconazole tablets are an azole antifungal indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with: Invasive aspergillosis ( 1.1 ) Candidemia in non-neutropenics and other deep tissue Candida infections ( 1.2 ) Esop.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Voriconazole USP, an azole antifungal agent is available as film-coated tablets for oral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 9Likely indication confounding 7Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,065 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fluoride increased362,027.7
1,139.1–3,609.4ROR 2,031.1 · χ² 22,745 / p <1e-300
483.1 EB05 364.6 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Periostitis2261,050.5
870.2–1,268.2ROR 1,061.6 · χ² 112,496 / p <1e-300
480.9 EB05 430.6 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=197 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fluorosis40832.6
545.2–1,271.7ROR 834.2 · χ² 17,329 / p <1e-300
367.3 EB05 281.3 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=38 · ♀ 59% (drug 39%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy21427.8
255.8–715.5ROR 428.2 · χ² 5,889 / p <1e-300
233.3 EB05 161.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19 · ♀ 60% (drug 39%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Geotrichum infection61392.0
291.1–527.9ROR 393.1 · χ² 16,604 / p <1e-300
256.1 EB05 206.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Scopulariopsis infection13389.0
204.2–741.0ROR 389.2 · χ² 3,307 / p <1e-300
197.1 EB05 122.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Scedosporium infection165304.4
255.6–362.5ROR 306.8 · χ² 37,633 / p <1e-300
225.2 EB05 197.8 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=165 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mycotic endophthalmitis43287.9
204.8–404.8ROR 288.5 · χ² 9,233 / p <1e-300
201.8 EB05 156.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43not reported in cached trials
Fusarium infection142255.1
212.1–306.8ROR 256.8 · χ² 28,180 / p <1e-300
196.3 EB05 170.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=140 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disseminated trichosporonosis13234.9
128.1–430.7ROR 235.0 · χ² 2,247 / p <1e-300
148.2 EB05 92.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Pericarditis fungal13234.9
128.1–430.7ROR 235.0 · χ² 2,247 / p <1e-300
148.2 EB05 92.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Photodermatosis82231.6
182.0–294.7ROR 232.5 · χ² 14,976 / p <1e-300
179.0 EB05 148.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Choroiditis72230.6
178.3–298.1ROR 231.3 · χ² 13,079 / p <1e-300
177.3 EB05 145.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%)not reported in cached trials
Disseminated aspergillosis85215.3
170.2–272.3ROR 216.2 · χ² 14,629 / p <1e-300
169.3 EB05 141.2 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=85 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disseminated mucormycosis69210.4
162.2–273.0ROR 211.1 · χ² 11,619 / p <1e-300
164.9 EB05 134.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pulmonary mucormycosis84189.3
149.8–239.1ROR 190.0 · χ² 12,977 / p <1e-300
152.7 EB05 127.2 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=84 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Osteomyelitis fungal25184.1
120.0–282.5ROR 184.4 · χ² 3,667 / p <1e-300
138.5 EB05 98.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25not reported in cached trials
Aspergilloma45157.3
114.8–215.5ROR 157.6 · χ² 5,868 / p <1e-300
128.0 EB05 99.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=45 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Systemic mycosis161155.6
131.8–183.7ROR 156.7 · χ² 21,137 / p <1e-300
131.9 EB05 115.7 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=160 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Abscess fungal22150.5
96.0–235.8ROR 150.6 · χ² 2,695 / p <1e-300
117.2 EB05 81.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mucormycosis331143.4
127.9–160.8ROR 145.6 · χ² 40,593 / p <1e-300
124.0 EB05 113.2 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=331 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aspergillus infection831142.9
133.0–153.5ROR 148.6 · χ² 101,784 / p <1e-300
124.1 EB05 117.2 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=830 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aspergillus test positive39140.9
100.7–197.2ROR 141.2 · χ² 4,602 / p <1e-300
116.1 EB05 88.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=38 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis882125.3
116.9–134.2ROR 130.6 · χ² 96,087 / p <1e-300
110.6 EB05 104.6 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 67.8 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Trichosporon infection44121.4
88.8–166.1ROR 121.7 · χ² 4,557 / p <1e-300
103.1 EB05 80.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chloropsia14118.6
68.1–206.7ROR 118.7 · χ² 1,350 / p 7e-296
92.7 EB05 58.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14not reported in cached trials
Zygomycosis51117.1
87.6–156.6ROR 117.4 · χ² 5,128 / p <1e-300
100.6 EB05 79.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Actinic keratosis259107.0
94.2–121.6ROR 108.3 · χ² 24,369 / p <1e-300
95.7 EB05 86.3 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=257not reported in cached trials
Transmission of an infectious agent via product18105.7
65.0–172.0ROR 105.8 · χ² 1,589 / p <1e-300
86.8 EB05 58.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Phaehyphomycosis13102.9
58.1–182.3ROR 102.9 · χ² 1,094 / p 3e-240
82.1 EB05 51.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13not reported in cached trials
Eye infection fungal36102.0
72.3–143.8ROR 102.2 · χ² 3,163 / p <1e-300
88.1 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=36not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Voriconazole as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,9392.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.3 · χ² 5,257 / p <1e-300
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.9not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,0772.3
2.2–2.4ROR 2.5 · χ² 1,636 / p <1e-300
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Drug interaction2,01312.5
12.0–13.0ROR 13.6 · χ² 21,114 / p <1e-300
12.3 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.0 · 94% clinicianNCT01151085: 1/946 (0.1%) on Voriconazole (serious AE)
Pyrexia (fever)1,0603.0
2.8–3.2ROR 3.1 · χ² 1,412 / p <1e-300
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2NCT01151085: 1/946 (0.1%) on Voriconazole
Pneumonia (lung infection)9022.7
2.5–2.9ROR 2.8 · χ² 988 / p 3e-217
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis882125.3
116.9–134.2ROR 130.6 · χ² 96,087 / p <1e-300
110.6 EB05 104.6 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 67.8 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated8552.8
2.6–2.9ROR 2.8 · χ² 966 / p 3e-212
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aspergillus infection831142.9
133.0–153.5ROR 148.6 · χ² 101,784 / p <1e-300
124.1 EB05 117.2 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=830 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Death7220.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 32 / p 9e-9
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.5not reported in cached trials
Respiratory failure6809.1
8.5–9.8ROR 9.4 · χ² 4,883 / p <1e-300
9.0 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.6 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Product use in unapproved indication6522.6
2.4–2.8ROR 2.6 · χ² 644 / p 2e-142
2.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug resistance59022.8
21.1–24.7ROR 23.4 · χ² 12,016 / p <1e-300
22.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.2 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Voriconazole ↔ Hallucination.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Voriconazole?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Voriconazole are pyrexia, pneumonia, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, aspergillus infection, febrile neutropenia, respiratory failure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Voriconazole have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Voriconazole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Voriconazole causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.