Voriconazole side effects: what 30,201 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
30,201 reports · 92% serious · 8,851 with death outcome · 39% female
Used for
Voriconazole tablets are an azole antifungal indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with: Invasive aspergillosis ( 1.1 ) Candidemia in non-neutropenics and other deep tissue Candida infections ( 1.2 ) Esop.
What it is
Voriconazole USP, an azole antifungal agent is available as film-coated tablets for oral administration.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,146 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride increased | 43 | 2,942.1 1,478.6–5,854.1ROR 2,946.3 · calibrated p 3e-19 ✓ | 445.3 EB05 344.4 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 45.1 (29.0–70.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Periostitis | 236 | 823.8 681.9–995.3ROR 830.3 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓ | 363.3 EB05 326.0 · IC025 +7.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 39.4 (32.9–47.3) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=207 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Fluorosis | 44 | 716.8 469.7–1,093.8ROR 717.8 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓ | 304.2 EB05 236.0 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 32.6 (21.8–48.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious n=42 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral aspergillosis | 199 | 334.5 282.5–396.2ROR 336.8 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓ | 220.3 EB05 195.8 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 26.3 (21.9–31.5) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=199 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy | 21 | 305.7 182.8–511.3ROR 305.9 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 177.7 EB05 122.6 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 37.8 (20.6–69.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Geotrichum infection | 61 | 280.1 208.0–377.2ROR 280.7 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 187.4 EB05 151.2 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 19.4 (14.2–26.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=61 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Mycotic endophthalmitis | 47 | 231.4 166.2–322.0ROR 231.7 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 161.9 EB05 126.6 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 22.2 (15.5–31.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=47 | no trial data cached |
| Scedosporium infection | 172 | 229.9 193.5–273.1ROR 231.2 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 169.1 EB05 148.9 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 18.3 (15.3–22.0) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=172 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Fusarium infection | 151 | 197.2 164.6–236.2ROR 198.2 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓ | 150.4 EB05 131.3 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 15.2 (12.6–18.4) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=149 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Photodermatosis | 84 | 170.5 134.3–216.5ROR 171.0 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓ | 132.7 EB05 110.5 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 38.7 (28.5–52.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=79 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Chloropsia | 25 | 167.7 108.3–259.7ROR 167.8 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓ | 122.5 EB05 87.2 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 67.4 (35.0–129.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=25 | no trial data cached |
| Choroiditis | 72 | 164.8 127.4–213.1ROR 165.2 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 128.5 EB05 105.5 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 37.8 (27.2–52.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=72 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) | no trial data cached |
| Central nervous system fungal infection | 41 | 164.1 116.7–230.6ROR 164.3 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓ | 124.9 EB05 96.0 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 19.6 (13.4–28.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=41 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Fungal endocarditis | 56 | 163.7 122.4–219.1ROR 164.0 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 126.7 EB05 101.2 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 25.5 (18.2–35.7) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=56 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Disseminated aspergillosis | 87 | 158.3 125.4–199.8ROR 158.8 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 125.3 EB05 104.7 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 32.8 (24.6–43.8) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=87 · 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Disseminated mucormycosis | 69 | 150.4 115.9–195.1ROR 150.7 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓ | 119.4 EB05 97.6 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 14.2 (10.7–18.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=69 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aspergilloma | 56 | 145.7 109.2–194.4ROR 146.0 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 115.6 EB05 92.4 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 33.6 (23.4–48.1) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=56 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Pulmonary mucormycosis | 86 | 139.1 110.4–175.4ROR 139.5 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 112.9 EB05 94.3 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 19.9 (15.3–25.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=86 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aspergillus test positive | 51 | 137.9 102.1–186.3ROR 138.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 110.3 EB05 87.2 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 18.7 (13.4–26.1) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=49 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Keratitis fungal | 33 | 134.4 92.6–195.2ROR 134.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 105.8 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 26.0 (16.7–40.4) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=33 · ♀ 71% (drug 39%) | no trial data cached |
| Osteomyelitis fungal | 25 | 131.6 85.8–201.8ROR 131.7 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓ | 102.1 EB05 72.7 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 28.6 (17.0–48.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=25 | no trial data cached |
| Zygomycosis | 73 | 126.4 98.5–162.3ROR 126.8 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 104.0 EB05 85.5 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 26.2 (19.5–35.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=73 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Systemic mycosis | 175 | 122.6 104.4–143.9ROR 123.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 102.9 EB05 90.8 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 14.5 (12.2–17.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=174 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Abscess fungal | 24 | 119.0 77.1–183.5ROR 119.1 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 94.1 EB05 66.6 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 23.2 (14.0–38.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Dilatation intrahepatic duct acquired | 42 | 117.8 84.9–163.4ROR 117.9 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 96.3 EB05 74.3 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 37.8 (24.6–57.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 39%) | no trial data cached |
| Toxic optic neuropathy | 61 | 114.7 87.4–150.3ROR 114.9 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 95.5 EB05 77.0 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 40.4 (28.2–58.0) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=61 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aspergillus infection | 908 | 113.1 105.5–121.2ROR 116.6 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 97.0 EB05 91.8 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 18.6 (17.2–20.1) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=907 | no trial data cached |
| Mucormycosis | 358 | 112.2 100.4–125.4ROR 113.5 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓ | 96.1 EB05 88.0 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 13.6 (12.1–15.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=358 · 92% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis | 1,051 | 109.4 102.6–116.7ROR 113.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 94.3 EB05 89.6 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 20.9 (19.4–22.5) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 58.7 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Xanthopsia | 46 | 99.3 72.9–135.2ROR 99.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 83.9 EB05 65.5 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 96.5 (56.0–166.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=43 | no trial data cached |
| Lip squamous cell carcinoma | 21 | 99.1 62.7–156.6ROR 99.2 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 80.5 EB05 55.6 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 22.7 (13.2–38.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) | no trial data cached |
| Trichosporon infection | 47 | 93.5 68.9–126.8ROR 93.6 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 79.8 EB05 62.4 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 27.7 (19.0–40.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=46 · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Cerebral fungal infection | 33 | 92.9 64.6–133.6ROR 93.0 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 78.3 EB05 58.4 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 49.8 (29.6–83.8) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=33 | no trial data cached |
| Actinic keratosis | 295 | 88.4 78.4–99.8ROR 89.3 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 78.1 EB05 70.9 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 33.2 (28.4–38.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=293 | no trial data cached |
| Aspergillosis | 145 | 85.3 71.8–101.3ROR 85.7 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 75.2 EB05 65.5 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 19.1 (15.6–23.3) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=142 | no trial data cached |
| Hepatosplenic candidiasis | 16 | 84.2 50.1–141.5ROR 84.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 69.2 EB05 45.1 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 16.8 (9.3–30.2) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=16 | no trial data cached |
| Transmission of an infectious agent via product | 18 | 75.6 46.4–122.9ROR 75.6 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 63.8 EB05 42.7 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 37.8 (19.6–72.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | no trial data cached |
| Eye infection fungal | 37 | 75.1 53.5–105.5ROR 75.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 65.6 EB05 49.7 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 13.8 (9.5–20.2) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious n=37 | no trial data cached |
| Dysplastic naevus | 34 | 72.7 51.1–103.5ROR 72.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 63.6 EB05 47.6 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 37.8 (23.5–60.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 39%) · 100% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Acanthamoeba infection | 18 | 72.4 44.6–117.7ROR 72.5 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 61.5 EB05 41.2 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 10.6 (6.3–17.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 4,243 | 2.2 2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.837 | 2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 7.0 (6.8–7.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.8 | no trial data cached |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 2,464 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.977 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 5.9 (5.7–6.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.1 | no trial data cached |
| Drug interaction | 2,358 | 10.5 10.1–10.9ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓ | 10.3 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 8.3 (7.9–8.6) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 6.8 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Death | 1,476 | 1.2 1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.440 | 1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2 vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 7.9 (7.5–8.3) | Outcome field, not a reaction | serious PRR 0.7 | no trial data cached |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 1,442 | 2.9 2.8–3.1ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.628 | 2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 5.3 (5.0–5.6) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial data cached |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 1,349 | 2.9 2.8–3.1ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.628 | 2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 6.7 (6.3–7.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial data cached |
| Condition aggravated | 1,133 | 2.6 2.5–2.8ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.742 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 6.1 (5.7–6.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.4 | no trial data cached |
| Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis | 1,051 | 109.4 102.6–116.7ROR 113.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 94.3 EB05 89.6 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 20.9 (19.4–22.5) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious PRR 58.7 · 94% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Aspergillus infection | 908 | 113.1 105.5–121.2ROR 116.6 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 97.0 EB05 91.8 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 18.6 (17.2–20.1) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=907 | no trial data cached |
| Febrile neutropenia | 905 | 9.6 9.0–10.2ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.034 ✓ | 9.5 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 5.2 (4.9–5.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 5.9 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Respiratory failure | 853 | 8.2 7.7–8.8ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.057 | 8.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 10.9 (10.1–11.8) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.1 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Nausea | 774 | 0.7 0.6–0.7ROR 0.7 · calibrated p 0.117 | 0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 2.7 (2.5–2.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 0.7 | no trial data cached |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 772 | 0.8 0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.201 | 0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 3.0 (2.8–3.2) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 0.8 | no trial data cached |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 751 | 0.9 0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.256 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 3.4 (3.2–3.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 0.7 | no trial data cached |
| Product use in unapproved indication | 748 | 2.1 2.0–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.972 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 vs other Azole Antifungals: PRR 4.9 (4.6–5.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.5 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Fluoride increased — n=43, PRR 2,942.1
- Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy — n=21, PRR 305.7
- Geotrichum infection — n=61, PRR 280.1
- Mycotic endophthalmitis — n=47, PRR 231.4
- Photodermatosis — n=84, PRR 170.5
- Chloropsia — n=25, PRR 167.7
- Choroiditis — n=72, PRR 164.8
- Disseminated mucormycosis — n=69, PRR 150.4
- Pulmonary mucormycosis — n=86, PRR 139.1
- Osteomyelitis fungal — n=25, PRR 131.6
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Voriconazole ↔ Hallucination.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Voriconazole?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Voriconazole are pyrexia, pneumonia, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, aspergillus infection, febrile neutropenia, respiratory failure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Voriconazole have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Voriconazole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Voriconazole causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 16a80777-f1f3-45bb-a312-998b07767fe3, effective 20260424; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"VORICONAZOLE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,186 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.