← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Acetazolamide and Metabolic acidosis: is the FAERS signal real?

n=206 co-reports · PRR 23.1 · ROR 23.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Acetazolamide ↔ Metabolic acidosis

n=206 co-reports · PRR 23.1 · ROR 23.9

Acetazolamide inhibits carbonic anhydrase, causing bicarbonate loss in the urine and a hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis — a direct, expected consequence of the mechanism (206 co-reports, PRR 23.1). It is used deliberately for this effect in some settings (altitude illness, metabolic alkalosis) and becomes a limiting toxicity at high doses or in renal impairment; paraesthesias, hypokalaemia, and nephrolithiasis commonly accompany it.

Regulatory basis: acetazolamide prescribing information — metabolic acidosis; carbonic-anhydrase-inhibitor pharmacology.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metAcidosis develops within days
StrengthmetPRR 23.1, large
ConsistencymetConsistent across case series
SpecificitypartialShared across carbonic-anhydrase inhibitors
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetDirect consequence of bicarbonate loss
CoherencemetFits the mechanism exactly
ExperimentmetAcid-base change is measurable on protocol labs
AnalogymetAnalogous to topiramate-induced acidosis

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for acetazolamide captured metabolic acidosis as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Trials reported acetazolamide's acid-base effect through laboratory measures rather than a coded adverse-event table entry.