← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Benzocaine and Methaemoglobinaemia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=35 co-reports · PRR 46.5 · ROR 48.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Benzocaine ↔ Methaemoglobinaemia

n=35 co-reports · PRR 46.5 · ROR 48.2

Benzocaine is a topical anaesthetic; its metabolite oxidises haemoglobin, and methaemoglobinaemia (reported here as cyanosis, 35 co-reports, PRR 46.5) is a rare but potentially fatal effect, most often with sprays used for procedures in children. The FDA issued a warning specifically about benzocaine sprays in infants, and the reaction is dose- and patient-related.

Regulatory basis: benzocaine labelling — FDA warning on methaemoglobinaemia with benzocaine sprays; oxidant-haemolysis literature.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metOnset within an hour
StrengthmetPRR 46.5, very large
ConsistencymetReproduced across case reports
SpecificitymetHighly specific to oxidant anaesthetics
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetOxidative haemoglobin modification
CoherencemetFits the mechanism
Experimentn/aNot a trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to prilocaine methaemoglobinaemia

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for benzocaine captured methaemoglobinaemia as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Methaemoglobinaemia is rare and typically procedure-related, so trials did not report it as a coded event.