← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Bortezomib and Peripheral neuropathy: is the FAERS signal real?

n=6,473 co-reports · PRR 17.3 · ROR 18.6
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Bortezomib ↔ Peripheral neuropathy

n=6,473 co-reports · PRR 17.3 · ROR 18.6

Bortezomib causes a dose- and schedule-dependent peripheral neuropathy, often sensory and sometimes painful, that can be dose-limiting; 6,473 co-reports give PRR 17.3. The label advises monitoring and dose modification, favouring subcutaneous administration.

Regulatory basis: bortezomib prescribing information — peripheral neuropathy; dose/schedule modification.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWeeks, cumulative
StrengthmetPRR 17.3 with 6,473 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to proteasome inhibitors
Biological gradientmetStrong dose/schedule relation
PlausibilitymetPlausible proteasome-inhibition mechanism
CoherencemetFits bortezomib neurotoxicity
Experimentn/aOften monitored in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to thalidomide neuropathy

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — MTD, Safety, and Efficacy of Pomalidomide (CC-4047) Alone or With Low-dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT00833833)

Adverse eventPhase 1: 2 mg Pomalidomide (n=6) · Phase 1: 3 mg Pomalidomide (n=8) · Phase 1: 4 mg Pomalidomide (n=14) · Phase 1: 5 mg Pomalidomide (n=10)
Neuropathy peripheral1/60/81/143/10

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →