← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Carbamazepine and Agranulocytosis: is the FAERS signal real?

n=184 co-reports · PRR 3.2 · ROR 3.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Carbamazepine ↔ Agranulocytosis

n=184 co-reports · PRR 3.2 · ROR 3.2

Carbamazepine can cause blood dyscrasias including agranulocytosis and aplastic anaemia; 184 co-reports give PRR 3.2. The risk is idiosyncratic and potentially fatal, so the label advises immediate blood counts if fever, sore throat or infection develops.

Regulatory basis: carbamazepine (Tegretol) prescribing information — aplastic anaemia and agranulocytosis; prompt blood-count monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metIdiosyncratic, weeks to months
StrengthmetPRR 3.2 with 184 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across reports
SpecificitymetFairly specific to carbamazepine
Biological gradientnot establishedNot clearly dose-related
PlausibilitymetPlausible marrow toxicity
CoherencemetFits aromatic anticonvulsant dyscrasias
Experimentn/aToo rare for trial detection
AnalogymetAnalogous to phenytoin and valproate cytopenias

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for carbamazepine captured agranulocytosis as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Randomised epilepsy trials were far too small and short to capture idiosyncratic agranulocytosis.