← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Expected pharmacological effect

Cetuximab and Rash: is the FAERS signal real?

n=2,273 co-reports · PRR 3.5 · ROR 3.7
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Expected pharmacological effect

Cetuximab ↔ Rash

n=2,273 co-reports · PRR 3.5 · ROR 3.7

Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, characteristically causes an acneiform rash that reflects target engagement and can be dose-limiting and socially distressing; 2,273 co-reports give PRR 3.5. The label advises management with topical therapy and dose adjustment.

Regulatory basis: cetuximab (Erbitux) prescribing information — acneiform rash; management guidance.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metFirst weeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 3.5 with 2,273 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to EGFR inhibitors
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown EGFR skin mechanism
CoherencemetFits cetuximab's on-target effect
Experimentn/aOften coded in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other EGFR-inhibitor rash

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Compared to the Standard of Care (Extreme Regimen) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (NCT02741570)

Adverse eventNivolumab + Ipilimumab (n=468) · EXTREME Regimen (n=441)
Rash1/4680/441

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →