← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Cisplatin and Ototoxicity (hearing loss): is the FAERS signal real?

n=415 co-reports · PRR 4.3 · ROR 4.3
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Cisplatin ↔ Ototoxicity (hearing loss)

n=415 co-reports · PRR 4.3 · ROR 4.3

Cisplatin damages the hair cells of the inner ear, causing high-frequency hearing loss and sometimes tinnitus that can be permanent and is often worse in children treated for cancer. The injury is cumulative and is why hearing is monitored during and after cisplatin therapy. The 415 co-reports (PRR 4.3) reflect both the real effect and the drug's extensive use in curative chemotherapy regimens.

Regulatory basis: cisplatin prescribing information (ototoxicity warning; audiometric monitoring). Established platinum-ototoxicity literature.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHearing loss accrues with cumulative dosing and may be permanent
StrengthpartialPRR 4 on a large co-report count
ConsistencymetReproduced across oncology and paediatric audiology studies
SpecificitymetA recognised platinum-drug effect
Biological gradientmetCumulative-dose-related, worse in children
PlausibilitymetInner-ear hair-cell damage by platinum is the mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the labelled audiometric monitoring
ExperimentpartialDechallenge (dose reduction/withdrawal) limits further loss but does not reverse it; no randomized trial
AnalogymetAnalogous to ototoxicity from other platinum drugs and aminoglycosides

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for cisplatin captured deafness or hearing loss as a coded event; the toxicity is detected by audiometry in practice rather than recorded as a trial AE.