← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Dapsone and DRESS syndrome (eosinophilia): is the FAERS signal real?

n=354 co-reports · PRR 27.7 · ROR 28.7
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Dapsone ↔ DRESS syndrome (eosinophilia)

n=354 co-reports · PRR 27.7 · ROR 28.7

Dapsone is an antimicrobial used in leprosy, dermatitis herpetiformis, and Pneumocystis prophylaxis; the dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome — a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) of fever, rash, eosinophilia, and internal-organ involvement — appears here as 354 co-reports (PRR 27.7). It typically begins weeks after starting therapy and can be fatal, so the label advises stopping the drug and urgent assessment if it is suspected.

Regulatory basis: dapsone prescribing information — dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome/DRESS; monitoring for fever, rash, and eosinophilia.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metOnset weeks after starting
StrengthmetPRR 27.7, large
ConsistencymetReproduced across case series
SpecificitymetFairly specific to dapsone
Biological gradientnot establishedNot clearly dose-related
PlausibilitymetIdiosyncratic immuno-allergic reaction
CoherencemetFits the DRESS picture
Experimentn/aToo rare for trial detection
AnalogymetAnalogous to other drug-induced DRESS

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for dapsone captured dress syndrome (eosinophilia) as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. DRESS is rare and idiosyncratic, so treatment trials did not capture it as a coded event.