← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Doxorubicin and Cardiotoxicity: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,221 co-reports · PRR 37.7 · ROR 38.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Doxorubicin ↔ Cardiotoxicity

n=1,221 co-reports · PRR 37.7 · ROR 38.2

Doxorubicin carries a boxed warning for cardiotoxicity: cumulative-dose-related cardiomyopathy and heart failure, with risk rising above threshold doses; 1,221 co-reports give PRR 37.7. The label advises cardiac monitoring and cumulative-dose limits.

Regulatory basis: doxorubicin prescribing information — boxed warning for cardiotoxicity; cumulative-dose limits and cardiac monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metMonths, cumulative
StrengthmetPRR 37.7 with 1,221 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to anthracyclines
Biological gradientmetStrong cumulative-dose relation
PlausibilitymetKnown free-radical mechanism
CoherencemetFits anthracycline cardiomyopathy
Experimentn/aOften monitored in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other anthracycline cardiotoxicity

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for doxorubicin captured cardiotoxicity as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Cardiac toxicity is monitored, but confounded by radiotherapy and other cardiotoxic agents.