← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Efavirenz and Depression / neuropsychiatric effects: is the FAERS signal real?

n=461 co-reports · PRR 3.8 · ROR 3.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Efavirenz ↔ Depression / neuropsychiatric effects

n=461 co-reports · PRR 3.8 · ROR 3.9

Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside HIV drug, commonly causes central-nervous-system effects — vivid dreams, dizziness, insomnia, and mood disturbance including depression — that often ease after the first weeks but can persist. The drug carries labelled warnings about psychiatric symptoms and suicidal thinking. The 461 co-reports (PRR 3.8) reflect both the real effect and efavirenz's long-standing role in HIV regimens, especially in resource-limited settings.

Regulatory basis: efavirenz prescribing information (neuropsychiatric symptoms, depression, and suicidality warnings).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metNeuropsychiatric symptoms appear early in therapy and may ease or persist
StrengthpartialPRR 4 on a moderate co-report count
ConsistencymetReproduced across HIV cohorts
SpecificitypartialA recognised efavirenz effect, less typical of other antiretrovirals
Biological gradientpartialPartly dose-related
PlausibilitymetCentral-nervous-system effects of the drug are the proposed mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the labelled psychiatric warnings
ExperimentpartialDechallenge (withdrawal/switch) usually improves symptoms; no randomized trial
AnalogymetAnalogous to neuropsychiatric effects of some other antiretrovirals

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for efavirenz captured depression as a coded event; the neuropsychiatric effects are identified through clinical reports and cohort data rather than a trial AE table.