← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Eptifibatide and Thrombocytopenia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=65 co-reports · PRR 16.0 · ROR 17.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Eptifibatide ↔ Thrombocytopenia

n=65 co-reports · PRR 16.0 · ROR 17.4

Eptifibatide is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor given intravenously during percutaneous coronary intervention; by blocking the final common pathway of platelet aggregation it produces both bleeding and, paradoxically, thrombocytopenia (65 co-reports here, PRR 16.0). The thrombocytopenia is acute, antibody-mediated in some cases, and the label requires platelet counts before and during therapy.

Regulatory basis: eptifibatide (Integrilin) prescribing information — thrombocytopenia and bleeding; platelet monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metPlatelet fall within hours
StrengthmetPRR 16.0, large
ConsistencymetReproduced across GPI experience
SpecificitypartialShared with tirofiban and abciximab
Biological gradientnot establishedNot clearly dose-related
PlausibilitymetImmune-mediated platelet destruction proposed
CoherencemetFits the anticoagulant picture
Experimentn/aNot a trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to abciximab thrombocytopenia

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for eptifibatide captured thrombocytopenia as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. PCI trials reported thrombocytopenia as a laboratory safety measure rather than as a coded adverse event.