← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Finasteride and Sexual dysfunction: is the FAERS signal real?

n=2,398 co-reports · PRR 90.4 · ROR 94.1
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Finasteride ↔ Sexual dysfunction

n=2,398 co-reports · PRR 90.4 · ROR 94.1

Finasteride blocks the conversion of testosterone to the more potent dihydrotestosterone, and because it works by reducing androgen signalling it commonly causes sexual side effects — reduced libido, erectile dysfunction, and reduced ejaculate volume — that are a direct consequence of its pharmacology. Most cases reverse on stopping the drug, though a minority report persistent symptoms, a topic of continuing debate and labelling changes. The very high PRR (90.4) reflects both the real effect and the drug's wide use in prostate conditions and hair loss.

Regulatory basis: finasteride prescribing information (sexual adverse reactions; post-marketing persistent-effects reports).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metSexual effects appear during treatment and usually resolve after withdrawal
StrengthmetPRR 90 — a very high relative signal on a large co-report count
ConsistencymetReproduced in trials and post-marketing data
SpecificitymetA recognised finasteride effect, tied to its androgen mechanism
Biological gradientpartialDose-related
PlausibilitymetReduced dihydrotestosterone signalling is the mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the labelled sexual-side-effect warnings
ExperimentpartialA randomized trial recorded sexual side effects by arm; persistence is debated
AnalogymetAnalogous to sexual side effects from other anti-androgens and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ A results-posting finasteride trial (NCT03004469) recorded sexual side effects only as isolated events across arms; the signal rests on the larger randomized trials and post-marketing reports rather than this single trial AE table.