← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Haloperidol and Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,630 co-reports · PRR 138.0 · ROR 147.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Haloperidol ↔ Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

n=1,630 co-reports · PRR 138.0 · ROR 147.9

Haloperidol is a leading cause of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, a life-threatening reaction of hyperthermia, rigidity and autonomic instability that can occur after any exposure; 1,630 co-reports give an extreme PRR of 138.0. Prompt recognition and withdrawal are essential.

Regulatory basis: haloperidol prescribing information — neuroleptic malignant syndrome warning.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metDays after start or dose change
StrengthmetPRR 138.0, an extreme signal
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to antipsychotics
Biological gradientnot establishedNot clearly dose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown dopaminergic blockade mechanism
CoherencemetFits haloperidol's D2 antagonism
Experimentn/aToo rare for trial detection
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antipsychotic NMS

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — The Modifying the Impact of ICU-Associated Neurological Dysfunction-USA (MIND-USA) Study (NCT01211522)

Adverse eventHaloperidol (n=192) · Ziprasidone (n=190) · Placebo (n=184)
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome0/1920/1900/184

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →