← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Haloperidol and Tardive dyskinesia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=378 co-reports · PRR 11.7 · ROR 11.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Haloperidol ↔ Tardive dyskinesia

n=378 co-reports · PRR 11.7 · ROR 11.8

Haloperidol, as a high-potency typical antipsychotic, carries a substantial risk of tardive dyskinesia with prolonged use; 378 co-reports give PRR 11.7. The label warns of this potentially irreversible effect and advises the lowest effective dose and periodic assessment.

Regulatory basis: haloperidol prescribing information — tardive dyskinesia warning; lowest effective dose.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metMonths to years of use
StrengthmetPRR 11.7 with 378 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to antipsychotics
Biological gradientmetCumulative dose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown dopaminergic supersensitivity
CoherencemetFits haloperidol's chronic effect
Experimentn/aChronic and under-coded in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antipsychotic tardive syndromes

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for haloperidol captured tardive dyskinesia as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Tardive effects appear after chronic exposure and are rarely captured in time-limited trials.