← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Imatinib and Fluid retention / oedema: is the FAERS signal real?

n=287 co-reports · PRR 28.5 · ROR 29.0
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Imatinib ↔ Fluid retention / oedema

n=287 co-reports · PRR 28.5 · ROR 29.0

Imatinib commonly causes fluid retention and periorbital or generalised oedema, occasionally with pleural effusion or severe weight gain; 287 co-reports give PRR 28.5. The label lists fluid retention and advises monitoring and dose adjustment.

Regulatory basis: imatinib (Gleevec) prescribing information — fluid retention/oedema; monitoring and dose adjustment.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWeeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 28.5 with 287 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to imatinib
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetPlausible kinase-inhibition mechanism
CoherencemetFits imatinib fluid retention
Experimentn/aOften coded in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other TKI oedema

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for imatinib captured fluid retention / oedema as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Fluid retention is coded in trials but confounded by disease-related oedema and other therapies.