← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Indapamide and Hyponatraemia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,318 co-reports · PRR 28.2 · ROR 30.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Indapamide ↔ Hyponatraemia

n=1,318 co-reports · PRR 28.2 · ROR 30.4

Indapamide is a thiazide-like diuretic whose most consequential electrolyte effect is hyponatraemia (1,318 co-reports, PRR 28.2), especially in older women, where it can cause confusion, falls, and seizures. The mechanism combines diuretic-induced sodium loss with impaired urinary dilution; the label advises monitoring electrolytes, and the effect usually resolves on withdrawal.

Regulatory basis: indapamide prescribing information — hyponatraemia.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metSodium falls over days to weeks
StrengthmetPRR 28.2, large
ConsistencymetConsistent across thiazide diuretics
SpecificitypartialShared with thiazides
Biological gradientmetWorse with higher doses and low intake
PlausibilitymetDiuretic-induced sodium loss
CoherencemetFits the mechanism
Experimentn/aNot a trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to thiazide hyponatraemia

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Efficacy and Safety of GMRx2 Compared to Dual Combinations for the Treatment of Hypertension (NCT04518293)

Adverse eventNot Randomized (n=859) · GMRx2 (n=551) · Dual - TA (n=282) · Dual - TI (n=276)
Hyponatremia19/85928/55112/28214/276

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →