Insulin glargine and Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose decreased): is the FAERS signal real?
Insulin glargine ↔ Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose decreased)
Reporting over time (stimulated-reporting check)
No reporting spike: the pair's share of the drug's reports is fairly stable over time (busiest two years hold 18% of 7,793 reports), so stimulated reporting is unlikely to explain the signal.
Bars: reports per year as a share of all FAERS reports for this drug, 2004–2025; amber = spike year (>3× the median share, ≥50 reports). Source: openFDA count=receivedate, retrieved 2026-10-09.
Insulin glargine is a long-acting basal insulin, and hypoglycaemia is its defining and most important adverse effect — a direct, dose-related consequence of the drug's own mechanism, not an idiosyncratic reaction. Every insulin product carries this risk, and it is the principal safety concern in insulin therapy, requiring careful titration and glucose monitoring. It is the textbook expected pharmacological effect: the drug's intended action (lowering glucose) can overshoot.
Regulatory basis: insulin glargine prescribing information (hypoglycemia listed as the most common adverse reaction and among the most important risks).
| Bradford Hill viewpoint | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Temporality (necessary) | met | Hypoglycaemia follows insulin action, within its duration of effect |
| Strength | met | PRR 24, on a very large insulin-treated population |
| Consistency | met | Universal across insulins and settings |
| Specificity | partial | A class effect of all insulins and secretagogues |
| Biological gradient | met | Close dose–effect relationship; the core of insulin titration |
| Plausibility | met | Direct consequence of exogenous insulin's glucose-lowering action |
| Coherence | met | Coheres with the entire insulin pharmacotherapy literature |
| Experiment | met | Dose reduction and glucose/glucagon correction reverse it — a clean on/off |
| Analogy | met | Shared by every insulin formulation and by insulin secretagogues |
This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.