← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Contested: signal not confirmed by large randomized trials

Isotretinoin and Inflammatory bowel disease: is the FAERS signal real?

n=5,252 co-reports · PRR 494.6 · ROR 553.6
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Contested: signal not confirmed by large randomized trials

Isotretinoin ↔ Inflammatory bowel disease

n=5,252 co-reports · PRR 494.6 · ROR 553.6

Isotretinoin has been linked to inflammatory bowel disease in case reports and some observational studies, but large cohort and meta-analytic analyses have not confirmed a causal increase; 5,252 co-reports nevertheless give PRR 494.6, a signal inflated by channeling and confounding. It is graded contested rather than established.

Regulatory basis: literature — isotretinoin and inflammatory bowel disease; label lists IBD among reported events but the association is disputed.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metCourses over months
StrengthmetPRR 494.6, inflated by channeling
ConsistencypartialObservational studies disagree
Specificitynot establishedAcne populations differ
Biological gradientnot establishedNo clear dose relation
PlausibilitypartialMechanism proposed but unproven
CoherencepartialCohort data argue against causality
Experimentn/aLarge cohorts did not confirm
AnalogypartialContrasted with other acne therapies

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for isotretinoin captured inflammatory bowel disease as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Observational designs are confounded by indication; meta-analyses of cohorts did not confirm the association.