← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Itraconazole and Heart failure: is the FAERS signal real?

n=153 co-reports · PRR 3.4 · ROR 3.5
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Itraconazole ↔ Heart failure

n=153 co-reports · PRR 3.4 · ROR 3.5

Itraconazole carries a labelled warning of negative inotropic effects and heart failure, particularly in patients with underlying ventricular dysfunction, and the FDA has advised caution and dose limits. The effect reflects the drug's ability to depress cardiac contractility, and it resolves on withdrawal in most cases. The 153 co-reports (PRR 3.4) are modest because heart failure is uncommon with itraconazole and the drug is used for narrower indications than fluconazole.

Regulatory basis: FDA/itraconazole prescribing information (heart failure warning; caution in ventricular dysfunction).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHeart failure develops during therapy and often improves after withdrawal
StrengthpartialPRR 3 on a modest co-report count
ConsistencymetSupported by post-marketing reports and the labelled warning
SpecificitymetA recognised itraconazole effect, tied to negative inotropy
Biological gradientpartialMore likely at higher doses and in patients with existing cardiac impairment
PlausibilitymetDirect negative inotropic action on the myocardium is the proposed mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the labelled caution in heart failure and dose limits
ExperimentpartialDechallenge (withdrawal) usually improves symptoms; no randomized trial
AnalogymetAnalogous to cardiac depression by other negative-inotropic drugs

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for itraconazole captured heart failure; the effect is uncommon, identified through post-marketing reports and the labelled warning rather than a trial AE table.