← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Ivermectin and Neurotoxicity: is the FAERS signal real?

n=246 co-reports · PRR 17.3 · ROR 17.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Ivermectin ↔ Neurotoxicity

n=246 co-reports · PRR 17.3 · ROR 17.9

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic used for onchocerciasis, strongyloidiasis, and scabies; neurotoxicity — drowsiness, confusion, ataxia, and in heavy infection a post-treatment encephalopathy — reflects massive release of parasite antigen or drug crossing a damaged blood-brain barrier, and coma carries 246 co-reports here (PRR 17.3). Risk is greater in Loa loa and in onchocerciasis co-infection, where the label advises caution.

Regulatory basis: ivermectin prescribing information — neurotoxicity caution in Loa loa; post-treatment encephalopathy literature.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metComa follows treatment
StrengthmetPRR 17.3, large
ConsistencymetReproduced across case series
SpecificitymetFairly specific to heavy microfilaraemia
Biological gradientpartialRelated to parasite burden
PlausibilitymetAntigen release and drug CNS toxicity
CoherencemetFits the pharmacology
Experimentn/aToo rare for trial detection
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antifilarial reactions

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for ivermectin captured neurotoxicity as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Post-treatment neurotoxicity is rare and restricted to high-microfilaraemia patients, so trials could not capture it as a coded event.