← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Lamotrigine and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: is the FAERS signal real?

n=2,615 co-reports · PRR 21.2 · ROR 21.6
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Lamotrigine ↔ Stevens-Johnson syndrome

n=2,615 co-reports · PRR 21.2 · ROR 21.6

Lamotrigine carries a warning for serious skin reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, strongly associated with rapid titration and HLA-B*1502; 2,615 co-reports give PRR 21.2. The label mandates slow titration and stopping at the first sign of rash.

Regulatory basis: lamotrigine prescribing information — serious skin rash/SJS/TEN warning; titration guidance.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metFirst 8 weeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 21.2 with 2,615 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetAssociated with HLA alleles
Biological gradientmetTitration-related
PlausibilitymetImmune-mediated mechanism
CoherencemetFits aromatic-anticonvulsant risk
Experimentn/aToo rare for trial detection
AnalogymetAnalogous to carbamazepine and phenytoin SJS

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for lamotrigine captured stevens-johnson syndrome as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. A rare idiosyncratic eruption cannot be detected in randomised trials.