← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Linagliptin and Pancreatitis: is the FAERS signal real?

n=331 co-reports · PRR 7.3 · ROR 7.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Linagliptin ↔ Pancreatitis

n=331 co-reports · PRR 7.3 · ROR 7.4

Linagliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor; acute pancreatitis is a labelled, if uncommon, risk (331 co-reports, PRR 7.3), and the label advises discontinuation if pancreatitis is suspected. The signal sits within the wider debate about incretin-based therapies and pancreatitis, where trial data have not consistently confirmed an excess.

Regulatory basis: linagliptin (Tradjenta) prescribing information — acute pancreatitis warning.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)partialLatency of days to months is plausible
StrengthmetPRR 7.3, moderate
ConsistencypartialReported across DPP-4 inhibitors
Specificitynot establishedCannot exclude cholelithiasis or alcohol
Biological gradientnot establishedNo established dose relationship
PlausibilitypartialBiologically debated
Coherencenot establishedMeta-analyses are inconclusive
Experimentn/aRare in trials
AnalogypartialDebated analogy across incretin drugs

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study With Linagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (CARMELINA) (NCT01897532)

Adverse eventPlacebo (n=3485) · Linagliptin (n=3494)
Pancreatitis acute3/34857/3494
Pancreatitis3/34856/3494
Pancreatitis chronic6/34852/3494

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →