← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Linezolid and Thrombocytopenia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=2,199 co-reports · PRR 14.2 · ROR 15.3
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Linezolid ↔ Thrombocytopenia

n=2,199 co-reports · PRR 14.2 · ROR 15.3

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic for resistant Gram-positive infections, causes reversible myelosuppression — most often thrombocytopenia, but also anaemia and, less commonly, leukopenia. Risk is clearly duration-dependent: it rises sharply after about two weeks of therapy, which is why the label recommends weekly blood counts and cautious use beyond 14–28 days. The mechanism is a time-dependent suppression of bone-marrow precursor proliferation, distinct from the immune-mediated cytopenias of some other drugs. Because it is dose- and duration-related and recovers off-drug, it behaves more like a predictable toxic effect than an idiosyncratic one, making it one of the cleanest antibiotic haematologic signals. The large count reflects both the true effect and the drug's role as a last-line MRSA agent.

Regulatory basis: linezolid prescribing information (myelosuppression warning; weekly blood-count monitoring). Randomized comparative antibiotic trials (linezolid vs tedizolid).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metPlatelet count falls during therapy and recovers after it stops
StrengthmetPRR 14 on a moderate co-report count
ConsistencymetReproduced across randomized trials and cohorts
SpecificitypartialShared with other myelosuppressive and infectious causes of low platelets
Biological gradientmetSharply duration-dependent — the basis for the weekly-count guidance
PlausibilitymetReversible suppression of bone-marrow precursors is well described
CoherencemetCoheres with the label's monitoring requirement
ExperimentmetRandomized head-to-head trials with platelet endpoints confirm the signal
AnalogymetAnalogous to chloramphenicol-associated myelosuppression

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✓ Trial evidence found — linezolid vs tedizolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia (NCT02019420), N=718

Term (as recorded)Linezolid (n=361)Tedizolid (n=357)
Thrombocytopenia (serious)50

Serious thrombocytopenia appears on the linezolid arm and not on the comparator — direct randomized evidence that even within a short treatment course, linezolid suppresses platelets more than a related newer agent. The duration-dependent escalation seen in practice is captured only partly by trials of this length. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →