← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Nevirapine and Hepatotoxicity: is the FAERS signal real?

n=170 co-reports · PRR 18.1 · ROR 18.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Nevirapine ↔ Hepatotoxicity

n=170 co-reports · PRR 18.1 · ROR 18.4

Nevirapine carries a boxed warning for severe, sometimes fatal hepatotoxicity, especially in the first weeks of therapy and in patients with higher CD4 counts; 170 co-reports give PRR 18.1. The label requires a lead-in dose and frequent liver monitoring early on.

Regulatory basis: nevirapine (Viramune) prescribing information — boxed warning for hepatotoxicity; lead-in dosing and liver monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metFirst 18 weeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 18.1 with 170 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetHigher in defined risk groups
Biological gradientnot establishedNot simply dose-related
PlausibilitymetPlausible immune-mediated injury
CoherencemetFits nevirapine hypersensitivity
Experimentn/aToo rare and severe for trial capture
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antiretroviral hepatotoxins

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — HIV Protease Inhibitors for the Prevention of Malaria in Ugandan Children (NCT00978068)

Adverse eventGroup 1 (n=84) · Group 2 (n=86)
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome0/841/86

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →