← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Nitrofurantoin and Peripheral neuropathy: is the FAERS signal real?

n=207 co-reports · PRR 2.8 · ROR 2.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Nitrofurantoin ↔ Peripheral neuropathy

n=207 co-reports · PRR 2.8 · ROR 2.8

Nitrofurantoin can cause peripheral neuropathy that may become irreversible, particularly with prolonged use or renal impairment; 207 co-reports give PRR 2.8. The label warns of this effect and advises prompt withdrawal if numbness or paraesthesia appears.

Regulatory basis: nitrofurantoin prescribing information — peripheral neuropathy; caution in renal impairment and prolonged use.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWeeks of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 2.8 with 207 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across reports
Specificitynot establishedPeripheral neuropathy has many causes
Biological gradientmetDuration/exposure-related
PlausibilitymetPlausible axonal toxicity
CoherencemetFits nitrofurantoin neurotoxicity
Experimentn/aNot a routine trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to other drug-induced neuropathies

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for nitrofurantoin captured peripheral neuropathy as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Short-course urinary-tract trials were too brief to detect treatment-emergent neuropathy.