← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Ondansetron and Prolonged QT interval: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,167 co-reports · PRR 6.4 · ROR 6.5
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Ondansetron ↔ Prolonged QT interval

n=1,167 co-reports · PRR 6.4 · ROR 6.5

Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist used for nausea and vomiting, prolongs the QT interval dose-dependently and can rarely trigger torsades de pointes; 1,167 co-reports give PRR 6.4. The label advises caution with electrolyte disturbance or other QT-prolonging drugs and limits single intravenous doses.

Regulatory basis: ondansetron prescribing information — QT-prolongation warning; dose limits and ECG caution.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWithin minutes to hours
StrengthmetPRR 6.4 with 1,167 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced in QT studies
Specificitynot establishedQT prolongation is common
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown cardiac ion-channel effect
CoherencemetFits ondansetron's cardiac effect
Experimentn/aMeasured in dedicated QT trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other QT-prolonging antiemetics

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for ondansetron captured prolonged qt interval as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Transient QT changes are usually protocol-monitored rather than coded as an adverse event.