← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Phenytoin and Gingival hypertrophy: is the FAERS signal real?

n=85 co-reports · PRR 60.6 · ROR 60.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Phenytoin ↔ Gingival hypertrophy

n=85 co-reports · PRR 60.6 · ROR 60.9

Phenytoin causes fibrous gingival overgrowth in a substantial minority of long-term users, related to concentration, oral hygiene and age; 85 co-reports give an extreme PRR of 60.6. The label lists gingival hyperplasia and advises good dental hygiene and monitoring.

Regulatory basis: phenytoin (Dilantin) prescribing information — gingival hyperplasia.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metMonths of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 60.6, an extreme signal
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to phenytoin
Biological gradientmetConcentration-related
PlausibilitymetKnown fibroblast-proliferation mechanism
CoherencemetFits phenytoin's connective-tissue effect
Experimentn/aNot a short-term trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to cyclosporine gingival overgrowth

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for phenytoin captured gingival hypertrophy as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Epilepsy trials were too short and did not code gingival changes as adverse events.