← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Pimozide and Prolonged QT interval: is the FAERS signal real?

n=23 co-reports · PRR 28.5 · ROR 29.9
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Pimozide ↔ Prolonged QT interval

n=23 co-reports · PRR 28.5 · ROR 29.9

Pimozide prolongs the QT interval and carries a boxed warning for this proarrhythmia, with ECG assessment advised before and during therapy; 23 co-reports give PRR 28.5. The label limits dose and warns against QT-prolonging co-medication.

Regulatory basis: pimozide (Orap) prescribing information — boxed warning for QT prolongation/torsades; ECG monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHours after dosing
StrengthmetPRR 28.5, an extreme signal
ConsistencymetReproduced across reports
SpecificitymetFairly specific to pimozide
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown hERG blockade
CoherencemetFits pimozide's cardiac effect
Experimentn/aSmall numbers limit trial capture
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antipsychotic QT effects

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for pimozide captured prolonged qt interval as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. QT effect is expected but the small treated population limits statistical capture.