← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Propofol and Infusion syndrome: is the FAERS signal real?

n=910 co-reports · PRR 12.9 · ROR 13.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Propofol ↔ Infusion syndrome

n=910 co-reports · PRR 12.9 · ROR 13.2

Propofol is an intravenous anaesthetic; with high-dose, prolonged infusion it causes propofol-related infusion syndrome — metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, cardiac failure, and renal injury (rhabdomyolysis 910 co-reports here, PRR 12.9). The syndrome is a direct consequence of impaired mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation, and the label advises limiting dose and duration and monitoring for the early signs.

Regulatory basis: propofol prescribing information — propofol-related infusion syndrome; dose/duration limits.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metOnset during prolonged infusion
StrengthmetPRR 12.9, large
ConsistencymetReproduced across case series
SpecificitymetFairly specific to propofol
Biological gradientmetDose- and duration-related
PlausibilitymetMitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation defect
CoherencemetFits the mechanism
Experimentn/aRare in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other anaesthetic-related myotoxicity

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for propofol captured infusion syndrome as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Infusion syndrome is rare and confined to high-dose prolonged use, so anaesthetic trials did not capture it as a coded event.