← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Risperidone and Weight gain: is the FAERS signal real?

n=9,452 co-reports · PRR 513.3 · ROR 552.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Risperidone ↔ Weight gain

n=9,452 co-reports · PRR 513.3 · ROR 552.8

Reporting over time (stimulated-reporting check)

2004: 67 reports (3.07% of the drug's reports)2005: 94 reports (4.31% of the drug's reports)2006: 137 reports (5.23% of the drug's reports)2007: 154 reports (6.36% of the drug's reports)2008: 103 reports (4.09% of the drug's reports)2009: 224 reports (5.23% of the drug's reports)2010: 218 reports (5.28% of the drug's reports)2011: 286 reports (6.94% of the drug's reports)2012: 195 reports (4.72% of the drug's reports)2013: 177 reports (5.29% of the drug's reports)2014: 194 reports (4.36% of the drug's reports)2015: 1,545 reports (10.11% of the drug's reports)2016: 783 reports (5.42% of the drug's reports)2017: 1,570 reports (11.41% of the drug's reports)2018: 467 reports (6.44% of the drug's reports)2019: 862 reports (10.64% of the drug's reports)2020: 366 reports (5.67% of the drug's reports)2021: 398 reports (7.58% of the drug's reports)2022: 367 reports (6.39% of the drug's reports)2023: 284 reports (5.33% of the drug's reports)2024: 278 reports (4.93% of the drug's reports)2025: 290 reports (5.66% of the drug's reports)05081114172023

No reporting spike: the pair's share of the drug's reports is fairly stable over time (busiest two years hold 26% of 9,059 reports), so stimulated reporting is unlikely to explain the signal.

Bars: reports per year as a share of all FAERS reports for this drug, 2004–2025; amber = spike year (>3× the median share, ≥50 reports). Source: openFDA count=receivedate, retrieved 2026-10-09.

Risperidone, like quetiapine, is a second-generation antipsychotic whose metabolic effects include substantial weight gain — a labeled, dose- and duration-related consequence of the class, with the risk varying meaningfully between agents. In a randomized head-to-head trial of risperidone versus quetiapine XR, "weight increased" was recorded in roughly 6% versus 5% of patients. The very high FAERS PRR reflects that weight gain is both common and reliably reported, but the effect itself is well established, not a statistical curiosity.

Regulatory basis: risperidone prescribing information (weight gain among the most common adverse reactions); FDA class metabolic warning for atypical antipsychotics.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metWeight rises after treatment begins, over weeks to months
StrengthmetPRR 513 here; a consistent effect in trials and cohorts
ConsistencymetReproduced across studies and across the antipsychotic class
SpecificitypartialClass effect, with real differences between individual agents
Biological gradientmetWeight change tracks with dose and duration
PlausibilitymetReceptor-mediated appetite/metabolic effects are well described
CoherencemetCoheres with the antipsychotic metabolic-syndrome literature
ExperimentpartialWeight loss on switching or withdrawal supports causality
AnalogymetShared with olanzapine, quetiapine, and other atypicals

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✓ Trial evidence found — risperidone vs quetiapine XR in schizophrenia (NCT00600756)

Term (as recorded)Risperidone (n=402)Quetiapine XR (n=391)
Weight increased (other events)2518

Roughly 6% of risperidone patients and 5% of quetiapine XR patients had weight gain recorded — a clean, randomized confirmation of the expected class effect, with risperidone slightly ahead in this trial. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →