← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitors) and Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION): is the FAERS signal real?

n=90 co-reports · PRR 9.4 · ROR 9.4
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitors) ↔ Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION)

n=90 co-reports · PRR 9.4 · ROR 9.4

Sildenafil and related PDE5 inhibitors have been linked to non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a sudden painless loss of vision from reduced blood flow to the optic nerve. This prompted an FDA label update in 2005; the association is debated and partly confounded by vascular risk factors that are common in the men who use the drug, so it is best described as an uncommon, plausibly drug-associated event rather than a certainty. The 90 co-reports (PRR 9.4) reflect both the signal and the difficulty of separating drug effect from background vascular risk.

Regulatory basis: sildenafil prescribing information (FDA 2005 label change on NAION; caution in patients with NAION history).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metVision loss occurs in a temporal relationship to use in case reports
StrengthpartialPRR 9 on a small co-report count — a modest signal for a rare event
ConsistencymetCase reports and observational studies, but with confounding by shared vascular risk
SpecificitymetA recognised drug-associated optic event, though other causes exist
Biological gradientpartialNot clearly dose-related
PlausibilitymetReduced optic-nerve perfusion is the proposed mechanism
CoherencemetCoheres with the FDA label change and caution in at-risk patients
ExperimentpartialObservational and confounded; no randomized trial
AnalogymetAnalogous to NAION attributed to other vasoactive drugs

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ A results-posting sildenafil trial (NCT00763867) recorded visual impairment in similar numbers in both arms and did not track NAION specifically; the signal rests on case reports, observational data, and the FDA label change rather than a trial AE table.