← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Contested: signal not confirmed by large randomized trials

Sitagliptin and Pancreatic cancer: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,670 co-reports · PRR 17.8 · ROR 18.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Contested: signal not confirmed by large randomized trials

Sitagliptin ↔ Pancreatic cancer

n=1,670 co-reports · PRR 17.8 · ROR 18.2

Sitagliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor; an excess of pancreatic cancer was reported in early analyses of incretin-based therapies and appears here as 1,670 pancreatic-carcinoma co-reports (PRR 17.8), but the signal is weak and consistently disappears once the underlying diabetes, obesity, and smoking are taken into account, so causality remains unproven.

Regulatory basis: sitagliptin (Januvia) prescribing information — pancreatic-cancer reviews by FDA/EMA; no confirmed causal link.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)partialLatency of years is plausible
StrengthmetPRR 17.8, large
Consistencynot establishedNot consistently reproduced
Specificitynot establishedCannot exclude confounding by diabetes
Biological gradientnot establishedNo clear dose relationship
PlausibilitypartialBiologically debated
Coherencenot establishedRandomised outcome trials are negative
Experimentnot establishedPooled analyses do not confirm it
AnalogypartialDebated analogy across incretin drugs

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for sitagliptin captured pancreatic cancer as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Pancreatic cancer has a long latency and low incidence, so the diabetes outcome trials could not detect it.