← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Sotalol and Prolonged QT interval: is the FAERS signal real?

n=446 co-reports · PRR 15.9 · ROR 16.3
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Sotalol ↔ Prolonged QT interval

n=446 co-reports · PRR 15.9 · ROR 16.3

Sotalol prolongs the QT interval through potassium-channel blockade and can cause torsades de pointes; it carries a boxed warning for this proarrhythmia and requires initiation with ECG monitoring and attention to renal function; 446 co-reports give PRR 15.9.

Regulatory basis: sotalol prescribing information — boxed warning for QT prolongation and torsades de pointes; ECG monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHours after dosing
StrengthmetPRR 15.9 with 446 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across studies
Specificitynot establishedQT prolongation has many causes
Biological gradientmetConcentration/dose-related
PlausibilitymetKnown potassium-channel blockade
CoherencemetFits class III antiarrhythmic effect
Experimentn/aOften monitored in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to other QT-prolonging antiarrhythmics

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial (NCT00911508)

Adverse eventLeft Atrial Ablation (n=1108) · Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy (n=1096)
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM QT PROLONGED2/11081/1096

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →