← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Tacrolimus and Nephrotoxicity: is the FAERS signal real?

n=6,153 co-reports · PRR 5.6 · ROR 5.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Tacrolimus ↔ Nephrotoxicity

n=6,153 co-reports · PRR 5.6 · ROR 5.8

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin-inhibitor immunosuppressant used widely in transplantation, causes kidney injury in much the same way as cyclosporine — acute vasoconstriction and, over time, chronic damage — so its levels and kidney function are monitored closely and doses are minimised. The very high FAERS count (6,153 co-reports, PRR 5.6) reflects both the real effect and the drug's use in a very large transplant population.

Regulatory basis: tacrolimus prescribing information (nephrotoxicity warning; therapeutic drug and renal monitoring).

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metKidney function worsens during therapy and can improve with dose reduction
StrengthmetPRR 6 on a very large co-report count
ConsistencymetReproduced across transplant medicine
SpecificitymetA calcineurin-inhibitor class effect
Biological gradientmetDose- and level-related
PlausibilitymetRenal vasoconstriction and chronic tubulointerstitial injury are the mechanisms
CoherencemetCoheres with the labelled drug-level and renal monitoring
ExperimentpartialDechallenge (dose reduction) often partly reverses it; no randomized trial
AnalogymetAnalogous to nephrotoxicity with cyclosporine

This page's own qualitative read, not an automated/citation-gated assessment.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for tacrolimus captured acute kidney injury as a coded event; kidney changes are captured through routine renal-function and drug-level monitoring rather than coded trial endpoints.