← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Thalidomide and Peripheral neuropathy: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,823 co-reports · PRR 11.3 · ROR 11.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Thalidomide ↔ Peripheral neuropathy

n=1,823 co-reports · PRR 11.3 · ROR 11.8

Thalidomide carries a boxed warning for peripheral neuropathy, a dose- and duration-related axonal injury that may be irreversible and is often the dose-limiting toxicity; 1,823 co-reports give PRR 11.3. The label advises baseline and periodic neurological assessment.

Regulatory basis: thalidomide prescribing information — boxed warning for peripheral neuropathy.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metMonths of therapy, cumulative
StrengthmetPRR 11.3 with 1,823 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetFairly specific to thalidomide
Biological gradientmetStrong cumulative-dose relation
PlausibilitymetKnown axonal toxicity
CoherencemetFits thalidomide neurotoxicity
Experimentn/aNeuropathy is a coded trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to bortezomib neuropathy

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Pomalidomide for the Treatment of Bleeding in HHT (NCT03910244)

Adverse eventPlacebo (n=49) · Pomalidomide (n=95)
Neuropathy peripheral0/492/95

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →