← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Expected pharmacological effect

Topiramate and Nephrolithiasis: is the FAERS signal real?

n=1,504 co-reports · PRR 7.7 · ROR 7.8
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Expected pharmacological effect

Topiramate ↔ Nephrolithiasis

n=1,504 co-reports · PRR 7.7 · ROR 7.8

Topiramate inhibits carbonic anhydrase, raising urinary pH and lowering citrate, which promotes calcium-phosphate kidney stones; 1,504 co-reports give PRR 7.7. Risk rises with long-term use, and the label advises adequate fluid intake to reduce stone formation.

Regulatory basis: topiramate prescribing information — kidney stones; increased fluid intake advised.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metMonths of therapy
StrengthmetPRR 7.7 with 1,504 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across cohorts
Specificitynot establishedKidney stones are common
Biological gradientmetDuration-related
PlausibilitymetKnown carbonic-anhydrase inhibition
CoherencemetFits topiramate's renal effect
Experimentn/aOften monitored in trials
AnalogymetAnalogous to zonisamide and acetazolamide stones

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for topiramate captured nephrolithiasis as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Kidney stones form over months and are rarely captured in epilepsy or migraine trials.