← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Expected pharmacological effect

Treprostinil and Headache: is the FAERS signal real?

n=17,283 co-reports · PRR 4.7 · ROR 5.3
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Expected pharmacological effect

Treprostinil ↔ Headache

n=17,283 co-reports · PRR 4.7 · ROR 5.3

Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue given by infusion or inhalation, produces the same vasodilator symptom cluster as epoprostenol, and headache dominates the reaction profile here (17,283 co-reports, PRR 4.7) — the count reflecting its use in large pulmonary-hypertension registries. Infusion-site pain, diarrhoea, and flushing accompany it, all intrinsic to prostacyclin effect.

Regulatory basis: treprostinil (Remodulin) prescribing information — headache and vasodilator effects.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metHeadache soon after starting
StrengthmetPRR 4.7 with a very large count
ConsistencymetConsistent across prostacyclin registries
SpecificitypartialShared with other prostacyclins
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetVasodilation mechanism
CoherencemetFits the mechanism
ExperimentmetTrials recorded vasodilator effects
AnalogymetAnalogous to epoprostenol headache

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✓ Trial evidence found — Digital Ischemic Lesions in Scleroderma Treated With Oral Treprostinil Diethanolamine (NCT00775463)

Adverse eventPlacebo (n=76) · Treprostinil Diethanolamine (n=71)
Headache32/7652/71

Post-marketing signal terms appear in this trial's posted adverse-event tables; per-arm counts shown as affected/at-risk. View on ClinicalTrials.gov →