← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Valproate and Hepatotoxicity: is the FAERS signal real?

n=65 co-reports · PRR 3.0 · ROR 3.0
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Valproate ↔ Hepatotoxicity

n=65 co-reports · PRR 3.0 · ROR 3.0

Valproate can cause serious, sometimes fatal hepatotoxicity, with the highest risk in children under two and in polytherapy; 65 co-reports give PRR 3.0. A boxed warning mandates baseline and periodic liver-function testing, and the drug is stopped if hepatic injury is suspected.

Regulatory basis: valproate prescribing information — boxed warning for hepatotoxicity; liver-function monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metCan be rapid in high-risk patients
StrengthmetPRR 3.0 with 65 co-reports
ConsistencymetReproduced across cohorts
SpecificitymetHighest in defined risk groups
Biological gradientmetDose and age related
PlausibilitymetKnown mitochondrial/β-oxidation toxicity
CoherencemetFits valproate's metabolic profile
Experimentn/aToo rare and severe for trial capture
AnalogymetAnalogous to other antiepileptic hepatotoxins

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for valproate captured hepatotoxicity as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Trials excluded the youngest, highest-risk children and were too small for rare hepatic failure.