← All causality assessments
Causality assessment · Causality: well established

Valproate and Thrombocytopenia: is the FAERS signal real?

n=455 co-reports · PRR 4.2 · ROR 4.2
A written Bradford Hill assessment of one drug–event pair. The grade is a judgement about the signal, not a statement that this drug causes this event in any one person; FAERS counts are reports, not rates.
Causality: well established

Valproate ↔ Thrombocytopenia

n=455 co-reports · PRR 4.2 · ROR 4.2

Valproate commonly lowers platelet counts through dose-related marrow suppression and can impair platelet function; 455 co-reports give PRR 4.2. Blood counts are checked before surgery and in patients with bruising or bleeding.

Regulatory basis: valproate prescribing information — thrombocytopenia; blood-count monitoring.

Bradford Hill viewpointStatusNote
Temporality (necessary)metGradual, dose-related
StrengthmetPRR 4.2 with 455 co-reports
ConsistencymetConsistent across cohorts
Specificitynot establishedLow platelets are common
Biological gradientmetDose-related
PlausibilitymetPlausible marrow suppression
CoherencemetFits valproate haematological effects
Experimentn/aRarely coded as a trial endpoint
AnalogymetAnalogous to other drug-induced thrombocytopenia

This table is this page's own qualitative read of the literature cited above, not an automated or citation-gated assessment — see the note at the bottom of this page.

✗ No ClinicalTrials.gov results-posting trial in the top search hits for valproate captured thrombocytopenia as a tracked adverse event in a usable structure. Trials did not routinely report platelet counts as coded adverse events.