← All comparisons
Head-to-head · FAERS comparison

Ambrisentan vs Macitentan: side effects in FDA adverse event reports

How to read this page. FAERS report counts have no denominator; the comparison is of reporting patterns, not of risk. Signals are screened against each FDA label (badges) but not causally assessed. Not medical advice.

At a glance

AmbrisentanMacitentan
Drug classEndothelin Receptor AntagonistEndothelin Receptor Antagonist
Brand names––
FAERS reports124,08268,750
Serious65%71%
Death outcome17,00512,527
Boxed warningYes EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY Ambrisentan tablets are contraindicated for use during pregnancy because it may cause major birth defects if used by pregnant patients, baYes EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY Macitentan tablets are contraindicated for use during pregnancy because it may cause fetal harm based on animal data [see Contraindication

Signals both drugs share

ReactionAmbrisentanMacitentanLabel screen (A / B)
Right ventricular failure1,240 · PRR 35.81,292 · PRR 68.1Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Infusion site infection490 · PRR 46.5396 · PRR 64.4Not in label — unassessed / Labeled (related wording)
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease92 · PRR 25.6125 · PRR 66.6Labeled — boxed warning / Labeled — boxed warning
Pulmonary arterial hypertension3,352 · PRR 50.43,291 · PRR 89.0Likely indication confounding / Likely indication confounding
Catheter site erythema328 · PRR 31.3417 · PRR 75.7Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Infusion site discharge298 · PRR 35.5271 · PRR 57.3Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheter site pruritus207 · PRR 52.2276 · PRR 140.6Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheter site discharge204 · PRR 38.3214 · PRR 73.5Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Infusion site irritation174 · PRR 27.4175 · PRR 49.8Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Infusion site warmth165 · PRR 26.8170 · PRR 50.1Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Transplant evaluation133 · PRR 59.4149 · PRR 125.7Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheter site rash90 · PRR 42.0143 · PRR 141.9Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheter site irritation49 · PRR 30.5101 · PRR 141.4Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Vascular device occlusion44 · PRR 25.354 · PRR 58.2Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheter site vesicles45 · PRR 51.849 · PRR 104.9Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Ventilation perfusion mismatch46 · PRR 33.639 · PRR 49.9Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Catheterisation cardiac abnormal38 · PRR 27.644 · PRR 59.4Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed

Labeled signals distinctive to Ambrisentan

Labeled signals distinctive to Macitentan

Common questions

Which has more reported side effects, Ambrisentan or Macitentan?

Ambrisentan has 124,082 FAERS reports and Macitentan 68,750. More reports does not mean more dangerous: volume follows how widely and how long a drug has been used, prescription vs over-the-counter status, and publicity. The seriousness share (65% vs 71%) is a better like-for-like signal of the kind of problems reported.

Which side effects do Ambrisentan and Macitentan share?

Both drugs carry disproportionality signals for right ventricular failure, infusion site infection, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, catheter site erythema. Shared signals often reflect a shared drug class or the condition both are used for.

Is Ambrisentan or Macitentan safer?

FAERS cannot answer that: it has no denominator and no comparator. Use this page to see which risks are already on each label and which signals are unlabeled, then check the prescribing information and your clinician for your situation.

Sources: openFDA FAERS pair statistics (OpenPV build 2026-09-14), FDA labels via openFDA, openFDA count queries for seriousness and deaths. Pair chosen because it is a commonly searched comparison. Generated 2026-10-08.